top of page

Search results

626 results found with an empty search

  • The Big Collection Of FIREWALL MANAGEMENT TIPS - AlgoSec

    The Big Collection Of FIREWALL MANAGEMENT TIPS Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue Talk to a Skybox transition expert. Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • AlgoSec | Removing insecure protocols In networks

    Insecure Service Protocols and Ports Okay, we all have them… they’re everyone’s dirty little network security secrets that we try not to... Risk Management and Vulnerabilities Removing insecure protocols In networks Matthew Pascucci 2 min read Matthew Pascucci Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 7/15/14 Published Insecure Service Protocols and Ports Okay, we all have them… they’re everyone’s dirty little network security secrets that we try not to talk about. They’re the protocols that we don’t mention in a security audit or to other people in the industry for fear that we’ll be publicly embarrassed. Yes, I’m talking about cleartext protocols which are running rampant across many networks. They’re in place because they work, and they work well, so no one has had a reason to upgrade them. Why upgrade something if it’s working right? Wrong. These protocols need to go the way of records, 8-tracks and cassettes (many of these protocols were fittingly developed during the same era). You’re putting your business and data at serious risk by running these insecure protocols. There are many insecure protocols that are exposing your data in cleartext, but let’s focus on the three most widely used ones: FTP, Telnet and SNMP. FTP (File Transfer Protocol) This is by far the most popular of the insecure protocols in use today. It’s the king of all cleartext protocols and one that needs to be smitten from your network before it’s too late. The problem with FTP is that all authentication is done in cleartext which leaves little room for the security of your data. To put things into perspective, FTP was first released in 1971, almost 45 years ago. In 1971 the price of gas was 40 cents a gallon, Disneyland had just opened and a company called FedEx was established. People, this was a long time ago. You need to migrate from FTP and start using an updated and more secure method for file transfers, such as HTTPS, SFTP or FTPS. These three protocols use encryption on the wire and during authentication to secure the transfer of files and login. Telnet If FTP is the king of all insecure file transfer protocols then telnet is supreme ruler of all cleartext network terminal protocols. Just like FTP, telnet was one of the first protocols that allowed you to remotely administer equipment. It became the defacto standard until it was discovered that it passes authentication using cleartext. At this point you need to hunt down all equipment that is still running telnet and replace it with SSH, which uses encryption to protect authentication and data transfer. This shouldn’t be a huge change unless your gear cannot support SSH. Many appliances or networking gear running telnet will either need the service enabled or the OS upgraded. If both of these options are not appropriate, you need to get new equipment, case closed. I know money is an issue at times, but if you’re running a 45 year old protocol on your network with the inability to update it, you need to rethink your priorities. The last thing you want is an attacker gaining control of your network via telnet. Its game over at this point. SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) This is one of those sneaky protocols that you don’t think is going to rear its ugly head and bite you, but it can! escortdate escorts . There are multiple versions of SNMP, and you need to be particularly careful with versions 1 and 2. For those not familiar with SNMP, it’s a protocol that enables the management and monitoring of remote systems. Once again, the strings can be sent via cleartext, and if you have access to these credentials you can connect to the system and start gaining a foothold on the network, including managing, applying new configurations or gaining in-depth monitoring details of the network. In short, it a great help for attackers if they can get hold of these credentials. Luckily version 3.0 of SNMP has enhanced security that protects you from these types of attacks. So you must review your network and make sure that SNMP v1 and v2 are not being used. These are just three of the more popular but insecure protocols that are still in heavy use across many networks today. By performing an audit of your firewalls and systems to identify these protocols, preferably using an automated tool such as AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer , you should be able to pretty quickly create a list of these protocols in use across your network. It’s also important to proactively analyze every change to your firewall policy (again preferably with an automated tool for security change management ) to make sure no one introduces insecure protocol access without proper visibility and approval. Finally, don’t feel bad telling a vendor or client that you won’t send data using these protocols. If they’re making you use them, there’s a good chance that there are other security issues going on in their network that you should be concerned about. It’s time to get rid of these protocols. They’ve had their usefulness, but the time has come for them to be sunset for good. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

  • From chaos to control - overcoming 5 challenges of network object management | AlgoSec

    Learn best practices for mastering network object management Webinars From chaos to control - overcoming 5 challenges of network object management Learn how to master network object management Join our free webinar on conquering 5 common network object management obstacles! Learn practical tips and strategies to simplify your network management process and boost efficiency. Don’t miss out on this opportunity to improve your network performance and minimize headaches. May 24, 2023 Kfir Tabak Product Manager Relevant resources Synchronized Object Management in a Multi-Vendor Environment Watch Video How to Structure Network Objects to Plan for Future Policy Growth Watch Video How to Manage Dynamic Objects in Cloud Environments Watch Video Choose a better way to manage your network Choose a better way to manage your network Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • Data center migration checklist + project plan template

    Minimize risks and maximize benefits with a successful data center migration Explore key considerations and strategies Data center migration checklist + project plan template Select a size Which network Can AlgoSec be used for continuous compliance monitoring? Yes, AlgoSec supports continuous compliance monitoring. As organizations adapt their security policies to meet emerging threats and address new vulnerabilities, they must constantly verify these changes against the compliance frameworks they subscribe to. AlgoSec can generate risk assessment reports and conduct internal audits on-demand, allowing compliance officers to monitor compliance performance in real-time. Security professionals can also use AlgoSec to preview and simulate proposed changes to the organization’s security policies. This gives compliance officers a valuable degree of lead-time before planned changes impact regulatory guidelines and allows for continuous real-time monitoring. Data center migration What is a data center migration? What are the four types of data center migration? What are data center migration best practices? How to plan for a successful data center migration? What are some common challenges of a data center migration? What are some common drawbacks of a data center migration? Checklist for a successful data center migration What are some data center migration tools? Get the latest insights from the experts Use these six best practices to simplify compliance and risk mitigation with the AlgoSec White paper Learn how AlgoSec can help you pass PCI-DSS Audits and ensure Solution overview See how this customer improved compliance readiness and risk Case study Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • Micro-segmentation from strategy to execution | AlgoSec

    Implement micro-segmentation effectively, from strategy to execution, to enhance security, minimize risks, and protect critical assets across your network. Micro-segmentation from strategy to execution ---- ------- Schedule a Demo Select a size ----- Get the latest insights from the experts Choose a better way to manage your network

  • AlgoSec | Introducing AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise: Your Comprehensive App-First Cloud Security Solution

    Is it getting harder and harder to keep track of all your cloud assets? You're not alone. In today's dynamic world of hybrid and... Cloud Security Introducing AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise: Your Comprehensive App-First Cloud Security Solution Iris Stein 2 min read Iris Stein Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 1/27/25 Published Is it getting harder and harder to keep track of all your cloud assets? You're not alone. In today's dynamic world of hybrid and multi-cloud environments, maintaining clear visibility of your IT infrastructure has never been more complex. 82% of organizations report that lack of visibility is a major factor in cloud security breaches. Traditional tools often fall short, leaving potential security vulnerabilities exposed and your business at risk. But there's good news! Introducing AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE) , a game-changer for managing and securing your on-premises and cloud networks. ACE provides the visibility, automation, and control you need to protect your business, no matter where your applications reside. What is AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise? AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE) is a comprehensive application-centric security solution built for the modern cloud enterprise. It empowers organizations to gain complete visibility, enforce consistent policies, and accelerate application delivery across cloud and on-premises environments. AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE) is the latest addition to AlgoSec's Horizon Platform, a comprehensive suite of security solutions designed to protect your applications and data. By integrating ACE into the Horizon Platform, AlgoSec offers a unified approach to securing your entire IT infrastructure, from on-premises to multi-cloud environments. For existing AlgoSec customers: ACE seamlessly integrates with your current AlgoSec deployments, extending your security posture to encompass the dynamic world of cloud and containers. For new AlgoSec customers: ACE provides a unified solution to manage security across your entire cloud estate, simplifying operations and reducing risk. Key Features and Capabilities ACE is packed with powerful features to help you take control of your application security: Deep application visibility: ACE discovers and maps all your applications and their components, providing a comprehensive view of your application landscape. You gain insights into application dependencies, vulnerabilities, and risks, enabling you to identify and address security gaps proactively. Unified security policy management: Define and enforce consistent security policies across all your environments, from the cloud to on-premises. This ensures uniform protection for all your applications and simplifies security management. Automated security and compliance: Automate critical security tasks, such as vulnerability assessment, compliance monitoring, and security change management. This reduces the risk of human error and frees up your security team to focus on more strategic initiatives. Organizations using automation in their security operations report a 25% reduction in security incidents . Streamlined change management: Accelerate application delivery with automated security workflows. ACE simplifies change management processes, ensuring that security keeps pace with the speed of your business. Maintain a full audit trail of all changes for complete compliance and accountability. Detect and prevent risks across the supply chain and CI/CD pipelines: Identify vulnerabilities in applications and block malicious containerized workloads from compromising business-critical production environments. Addressing Customer Pain Points ACE is designed to solve the real-world challenges faced by security teams today: Reduce application risk: Proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities and security threats to your applications. Accelerate application delivery: Streamline security processes and automate change management to speed up deployments. Ensure application compliance: Meet regulatory requirements and industry standards with automated compliance monitoring and reporting. Gain complete visibility: Understand your application landscape and identify potential security risks. Simplify application security management: Manage security policies and controls from a single, unified pane of glass. Prevent vulnerabilities from moving to production Ready to take your application security to the next level? Visit the AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise product page to learn more. Download our datasheet, request a personalized demo, or sign up for a free trial to experience the power of ACE for yourself. We're confident that ACE will revolutionize the way you secure your applications in the cloud. Contact us today to get started! Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

  • MITRE attack framework

    MITRE ATT&CK offers an open source framework for understanding adversarial tactics, techniques, and common knowledge in use today. MITRE attack framework Select a size Which network Can AlgoSec be used for continuous compliance monitoring? Yes, AlgoSec supports continuous compliance monitoring. As organizations adapt their security policies to meet emerging threats and address new vulnerabilities, they must constantly verify these changes against the compliance frameworks they subscribe to. AlgoSec can generate risk assessment reports and conduct internal audits on-demand, allowing compliance officers to monitor compliance performance in real-time. Security professionals can also use AlgoSec to preview and simulate proposed changes to the organization’s security policies. This gives compliance officers a valuable degree of lead-time before planned changes impact regulatory guidelines and allows for continuous real-time monitoring. What is the MITRE ATT&CK® framework? MITRE ATT&CK offers an open source framework for understanding adversarial tactics, techniques, and common knowledge in use today. It aggregates and catalogs cyber threats based on real-world adversary behavior observed across thousands of incidents, and outlines defenses to protect organizations against them. MITRE ATT&CK helps organizations understand how adversaries operate and guides them towards developing security measures to protect their assets and operations. Understanding the MITRE ATT&CK layout MITRE ATT&CK is organized into three matrices, each representing a dedicated technology domain: Enterprise Mobile Industrial control systems (ICS) Most organizations will use the enterprise matrix, which covers attacks against Windows, macOS, Linux, cloud platforms, network infrastructure, and containers. However, companies must first understand what malicious actors are seeking to achieve. Tactics The enterprise matrix opens to 14 columns representing adversary tactics, i.e., high-level goals: Initial access (getting in) through execution Reconnaissance Persistence Execution Privilege escalation Exfiltration and impact Next, comes the how. Techniques and Sub-Techniques Each tactic column leads to rows containing techniques and sub-techniques, i.e., specific methods for achieving a goal. The latest MITRE ATT&CK v18 features 8 to 47 techniques for each tactic. For example, under Reconnaissance, there are 11 techniques, including “Active Scanning” and “Phishing for Information.” Persistence lists techniques such as "Create Account" or "Boot or Logon Autostart Execution." Sub-techniques are nested within techniques for specific attack implementations. For instance, under "Phishing," you have "Spearphishing Attachment," "Spearphishing Link," "Spearphishing via Service," and “Spearphishing Voice.” This granularity is key, as you need a different technique to defend against phishing via email attachments than via compromised messaging platforms. MITRE ATT&CK Matrix The MITRE ATT&CK Matrix catalogs adversaries into groupings such as data sources, cyber threat intelligence (CTI) groups, and defense strategies. This allows users to filter their navigation to specific adversaries, tools, and campaigns relevant to their business operations. MITRE ATT&CK is constantly updated as adversaries and their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) evolve. Each version has new features based on empirical threat intelligence, incident response findings, and community research. This is especially important in the face of emerging threat trends, such as AI-assisted cyberattacks and the growth of ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS). Benefits of the MITRE ATT&CK framework MITRE ATT&CK doesn’t simply offer threat intelligence but also shapes organizations’ security operations for multiple use cases: Threat intelligence gathering: Gain context for cloud indicators of compromise (IOCs); beyond "bad IP address detected," know if the address is associated with a specific technique adversaries use for command and control. Threat hunting: Use a hypothesis-driven approach to systematically hunt for evidence of specific techniques used, instead of randomly searching logs. Attack simulation and red team exercises: Leverage real-world, standardized playbooks for testing both offensive capabilities and defensive responses; map your red team's successful tactics against your blue team's detection rates to identify coverage gaps with precision. Gap analysis: Visualize which techniques you can detect, which you can prevent, and most importantly, which represent blind spots in your security architecture. Response validation: Test whether your incident response procedures actually work against the techniques most relevant to your threat profile. The use cases above are a proof of concept, but the bottom line is the actual benefits companies reap from them: Shared understanding of the threat landscape: MITRE ATT&CK offers a common language for discussing adversaries across technical teams, executives, and even board members. Accurate simulation of attacks and validation of defenses: Mapped exercises tell you whether you can detect and respond to techniques adversaries actually use. Informed development and deployment of security policies: Craft policies that specifically address the techniques most relevant to your business risk profile. Intelligent selections of security solutions: Ask vendors which ATT&CK techniques they address and check those claims against your coverage gaps. Best practices for MITRE ATT&CK mapping The MITRE ATT&CK framework's value comes from mapping security data to specific ATT&CK techniques. But mapping without context is like having a map without knowing your starting location; it’s technically interesting, but operationally useless. The CISA best practices guide identifies two fundamental approaches to ATT&CK mapping: Mapping into finished reports (creating security insights for decision-making) Mapping into raw data (embedding ATT&CK context into operational security workflows). Understanding which approach fits your business needs is crucial. Mapping MITRE ATT&CK into finished reports This approach starts with collating incident reports, threat intelligence, or post-mortem analyses, extracting behavioral patterns, and then translating them into ATT&CK language. This creates artifacts that inform security strategy, resource allocation, and executive communication. The process follows six steps: Find the behavior. Identify specific actions the adversary took. Look beyond IoCs, such as malware names and IP addresses, to “how the adversary interacted with specific platforms and applications.” Research the behavior. Was this a standard administrative task gone rogue or a sophisticated persistence mechanism? Investigate the original source, technical details, timing, and surrounding activity. Consult malware analysis reports from reliable organizations, security reports, or your own forensic data. Translate the behavior into a tactic. Map the identified behavior to one of the tactics in the MITRE framework. Identify the technique used for the tactic. For example, within the Execution tactic, scan for the technique that best describes the method. ATT&CK provides detailed descriptions for each technique to help you map to the right one. Identify the sub-techniques. Was it a Windows scheduled task? A Linux Cron job? The sub-technique matters because detection and mitigation strategies for each differ significantly. Compare results to those of other analysts. CISA recommends that analysts treat mapping as a team sport where they work together to identify ATT&CK techniques and ensure quality control. Different analysts examining the same behavior should arrive at the same ATT&CK mapping. Mapping MITRE ATT&CK into raw data While finished reports inform strategy, mapping into raw data enables operations. This approach embeds ATT&CK context directly into your detection engineering, threat hunting, and daily security workflows. Organizations can choose from three viable starting points, each suited to different operational scenarios. 1. Start with a data source A specific data source , say, authentication logs from your cloud identity provider, allows you to see what ATT&CK techniques generate observable activity in these logs. For authentication logs, you would map to techniques like "Valid Accounts," "Brute Force," and "Credential Stuffing." You would then define procedures, i.e., the specific log patterns that indicate these techniques in action. This approach is ideal when deploying new data sources or optimizing existing ones. 2. Start with specific tools or attributes If threat intelligence indicates adversaries targeting your industry are using a specific software , malware family, or penetration testing tool, you can start mapping from there. After identifying techniques that the tool enables, you can then look up the groups and campaigns that have implemented these techniques. Cobalt Strike (S0154) , for example, maps to dozens of techniques across multiple tactics. By understanding this breadth, you can develop ways of identifying not just the tool itself but the behaviors it facilitates. 3. Start with analytics Just as adversaries use software to target businesses, analysts can use cloud enterprise tools to track adversary behavior. SIEM platforms like the AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE) have built-in detection rules that collect, log, and correlate events from multiple endpoints, cloud services, and identity providers. These events originate as raw telemetry, which are then mapped to specific MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Mapping with detection analytics from such tools is increasingly the most practical approach for organizations with mature security tooling. Note: Mapping into raw data shouldn't exist in isolation. Operational mappings should ultimately feed into finished reports. Your day-to-day detection analytics reveal what you're actually seeing in your environment. These observations, aggregated and analyzed over time, become the foundation for strategic reporting. How to ACE your operations with the MITRE ATT&CK framework Enterprises generate millions of security events daily across cloud infrastructure, endpoints, network boundaries, and SaaS applications. With this deluge, it is unreasonable to expect analysts to hand-map behaviors. Enter AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE), a cloud enterprise tool that offers full visibility into your operations by collecting log data, aggregating and contextualizing it, and then mapping it automatically to MITRE ATT&CK techniques. This transforms raw telemetry streams into structured threat intelligence aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework. ACE’s finished reports provide a clear, risk-oriented view of your adversary exposure, using language that every analyst and decision-maker can understand. See why more than 2,200 companies trust AlgoSec. Schedule a demo today. Get the latest insights from the experts Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • AlgoSec | Prevasio’s Role in Red Team Exercises and Pen Testing

    Cybersecurity is an ever prevalent issue. Malicious hackers are becoming more agile by using sophisticated techniques that are always... Cloud Security Prevasio’s Role in Red Team Exercises and Pen Testing Rony Moshkovich 2 min read Rony Moshkovich Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 12/21/20 Published Cybersecurity is an ever prevalent issue. Malicious hackers are becoming more agile by using sophisticated techniques that are always evolving. This makes it a top priority for companies to stay on top of their organization’s network security to ensure that sensitive and confidential information is not leaked or exploited in any way. Let’s take a look at the Red/Blue Team concept, Pen Testing, and Prevasio’s role in ensuring your network and systems remain secure in a Docker container atmosphere. What is the Red/Blue Team Concept? The red/blue team concept is an effective technique that uses exercises and simulations to assess a company’s cybersecurity strength. The results allow organizations to identify which aspects of the network are functioning as intended and which areas are vulnerable and need improvement. The idea is that two teams (red and blue) of cybersecurity professionals face off against each other. The Red Team’s Role It is easiest to think of the red team as the offense. This group aims to infiltrate a company’s network using sophisticated real-world techniques and exploit potential vulnerabilities. It is important to note that the team comprises highly skilled ethical hackers or cybersecurity professionals. Initial access is typically gained by stealing an employee’s, department, or company-wide user credentials. From there, the red team will then work its way across systems as it increases its level of privilege in the network. The team will penetrate as much of the system as possible. It is important to note that this is just a simulation, so all actions taken are ethical and without malicious intent. The Blue Team’s Role The blue team is the defense. This team is typically made up of a group of incident response consultants or IT security professionals specially trained in preventing and stopping attacks. The goal of the blue team is to put a stop to ongoing attacks, return the network and its systems to a normal state, and prevent future attacks by fixing the identified vulnerabilities. Prevention is ideal when it comes to cybersecurity attacks. Unfortunately, that is not always possible. The next best thing is to minimize “breakout time” as much as possible. The “breakout time” is the window between when the network’s integrity is first compromised and when the attacker can begin moving through the system. Importance of Red/Blue Team Exercises Cybersecurity simulations are important for protecting organizations against a wide range of sophisticated attacks. Let’s take a look at the benefits of red/blue team exercises: Identify vulnerabilities Identify areas of improvement Learn how to detect and contain an attack Develop response techniques to handle attacks as quickly as possible Identify gaps in the existing security Strengthen security and shorten breakout time Nurture cooperation in your IT department Increase your IT team’s skills with low-risk training What are Pen Testing Teams? Many organizations do not have red/blue teams but have a Pen Testing (aka penetration testing) team instead. Pen testing teams participate in exercises where the goal is to find and exploit as many vulnerabilities as possible. The overall goal is to find the weaknesses of the system that malicious hackers could take advantage of. Companies’ best way to conduct pen tests is to use outside professionals who do not know about the network or its systems. This paints a more accurate picture of where vulnerabilities lie. What are the Types of Pen Testing? Open-box pen test – The hacker is provided with limited information about the organization. Closed-box pen test – The hacker is provided with absolutely no information about the company. Covert pen test – In this type of test, no one inside the company, except the person who hires the outside professional, knows that the test is taking place. External pen test – This method is used to test external security. Internal pen test – This method is used to test the internal network. The Prevasio Solution Prevasio’s solution is geared towards increasing the effectiveness of red teams for organizations that have taken steps to containerize their applications and now rely on docker containers to ship their applications to production. The benefits of Prevasio’s solution to red teams include: Auto penetration testing that helps teams conduct break-and-attack simulations on company applications. It can also be used as an integrated feature inside the CI/CD to provide reachability assurance. The behavior analysis will allow teams to identify unintentional internal oversights of best practices. The solution features the ability to intercept and scan encrypted HTTPS traffic. This helps teams determine if any credentials should not be transmitted. Prevasio container security solution with its cutting-edge analyzer performs both static and dynamic analysis of the containers during runtime to ensure the safest design possible. Moving Forward Cyberattacks are as real of a threat to your organization’s network and systems as physical attacks from burglars and robbers. They can have devastating consequences for your company and your brand. The bottom line is that you always have to be one step ahead of cyberattackers and ready to take action, should a breach be detected. The best way to do this is to work through real-world simulations and exercises that prepare your IT department for the worst and give them practice on how to respond. After all, it is better for your team (or a hired ethical hacker) to find a vulnerability before a real hacker does. Simulations should be conducted regularly since the technology and methods used to hack are constantly changing. The result is a highly trained team and a network that is as secure as it can be. Prevasio is an effective solution in conducting breach and attack simulations that help red/blue teams and pen testing teams do their jobs better in Docker containers. Our team is just as dedicated to the security of your organization as you are. Click here to learn more start your free trial. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

  • AlgoSec | NACL best practices: How to combine security groups with network ACLs effectively

    Like all modern cloud providers, Amazon adopts the shared responsibility model for cloud security. Amazon guarantees secure... AWS NACL best practices: How to combine security groups with network ACLs effectively Prof. Avishai Wool 2 min read Prof. Avishai Wool Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 8/28/23 Published Like all modern cloud providers, Amazon adopts the shared responsibility model for cloud security. Amazon guarantees secure infrastructure for Amazon Web Services, while AWS users are responsible for maintaining secure configurations. That requires using multiple AWS services and tools to manage traffic. You’ll need to develop a set of inbound rules for incoming connections between your Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) and all of its Elastic Compute (EC2) instances and the rest of the Internet. You’ll also need to manage outbound traffic with a series of outbound rules. Your Amazon VPC provides you with several tools to do this. The two most important ones are security groups and Network Access Control Lists (NACLs). Security groups are stateful firewalls that secure inbound traffic for individual EC2 instances. Network ACLs are stateless firewalls that secure inbound and outbound traffic for VPC subnets. Managing AWS VPC security requires configuring both of these tools appropriately for your unique security risk profile. This means planning your security architecture carefully to align it the rest of your security framework. For example, your firewall rules impact the way Amazon Identity Access Management (IAM) handles user permissions. Some (but not all) IAM features can be implemented at the network firewall layer of security. Before you can manage AWS network security effectively , you must familiarize yourself with how AWS security tools work and what sets them apart. Everything you need to know about security groups vs NACLs AWS security groups explained: Every AWS account has a single default security group assigned to the default VPC in every Region. It is configured to allow inbound traffic from network interfaces assigned to the same group, using any protocol and any port. It also allows all outbound traffic using any protocol and any port. Your default security group will also allow all outbound IPv6 traffic once your VPC is associated with an IPv6 CIDR block. You can’t delete the default security group, but you can create new security groups and assign them to AWS EC2 instances. Each security group can only contain up to 60 rules, but you can set up to 2500 security groups per Region. You can associate many different security groups to a single instance, potentially combining hundreds of rules. These are all allow rules that allow traffic to flow according the ports and protocols specified. For example, you might set up a rule that authorizes inbound traffic over IPv6 for linux SSH commands and sends it to a specific destination. This could be different from the destination you set for other TCP traffic. Security groups are stateful, which means that requests sent from your instance will be allowed to flow regardless of inbound traffic rules. Similarly, VPC security groups automatically responses to inbound traffic to flow out regardless of outbound rules. However, since security groups do not support deny rules, you can’t use them to block a specific IP address from connecting with your EC2 instance. Be aware that Amazon EC2 automatically blocks email traffic on port 25 by default – but this is not included as a specific rule in your default security group. AWS NACLs explained: Your VPC comes with a default NACL configured to automatically allow all inbound and outbound network traffic. Unlike security groups, NACLs filter traffic at the subnet level. That means that Network ACL rules apply to every EC2 instance in the subnet, allowing users to manage AWS resources more efficiently. Every subnet in your VPC must be associated with a Network ACL. Any single Network ACL can be associated with multiple subnets, but each subnet can only be assigned to one Network ACL at a time. Every rule has its own rule number, and Amazon evaluates rules in ascending order. The most important characteristic of NACL rules is that they can deny traffic. Amazon evaluates these rules when traffic enters or leaves the subnet – not while it moves within the subnet. You can access more granular data on data flows using VPC flow logs. Since Amazon evaluates NACL rules in ascending order, make sure that you place deny rules earlier in the table than rules that allow traffic to multiple ports. You will also have to create specific rules for IPv4 and IPv6 traffic – AWS treats these as two distinct types of traffic, so rules that apply to one do not automatically apply to the other. Once you start customizing NACLs, you will have to take into account the way they interact with other AWS services. For example, Elastic Load Balancing won’t work if your NACL contains a deny rule excluding traffic from 0.0.0.0/0 or the subnet’s CIDR. You should create specific inclusions for services like Elastic Load Balancing, AWS Lambda, and AWS CloudWatch. You may need to set up specific inclusions for third-party APIs, as well. You can create these inclusions by specifying ephemeral port ranges that correspond to the services you want to allow. For example, NAT gateways use ports 1024 to 65535. This is the same range covered by AWS Lambda functions, but it’s different than the range used by Windows operating systems. When creating these rules, remember that unlike security groups, NACLs are stateless. That means that when responses to allowed traffic are generated, those responses are subject to NACL rules. Misconfigured NACLs deny traffic responses that should be allowed, leading to errors, reduced visibility, and potential security vulnerabilities . How to configure and map NACL associations A major part of optimizing NACL architecture involves mapping the associations between security groups and NACLs. Ideally, you want to enforce a specific set of rules at the subnet level using NACLs, and a different set of instance-specific rules at the security group level. Keeping these rulesets separate will prevent you from setting inconsistent rules and accidentally causing unpredictable performance problems. The first step in mapping NACL associations is using the Amazon VPC console to find out which NACL is associated with a particular subnet. Since NACLs can be associated with multiple subnets, you will want to create a comprehensive list of every association and the rules they contain. To find out which NACL is associated with a subnet: Open the Amazon VPC console . Select Subnets in the navigation pane. Select the subnet you want to inspect. The Network ACL tab will display the ID of the ACL associated with that network, and the rules it contains. To find out which subnets are associated with a NACL: Open the Amazon VPC console . Select Network ACLS in the navigation pane. Click over to the column entitled Associated With. Select a Network ACL from the list. Look for Subnet associations on the details pane and click on it. The pane will show you all subnets associated with the selected Network ACL. Now that you know how the difference between security groups and NACLs and you can map the associations between your subnets and NACLs, you’re ready to implement some security best practices that will help you strengthen and simplify your network architecture. 5 best practices for AWS NACL management Pay close attention to default NACLs, especially at the beginning Since every VPC comes with a default NACL, many AWS users jump straight into configuring their VPC and creating subnets, leaving NACL configuration for later. The problem here is that every subnet associated with your VPC will inherit the default NACL. This allows all traffic to flow into and out of the network. Going back and building a working security policy framework will be difficult and complicated – especially if adjustments are still being made to your subnet-level architecture. Taking time to create custom NACLs and assign them to the appropriate subnets as you go will make it much easier to keep track of changes to your security posture as you modify your VPC moving forward. Implement a two-tiered system where NACLs and security groups complement one another Security groups and NACLs are designed to complement one another, yet not every AWS VPC user configures their security policies accordingly. Mapping out your assets can help you identify exactly what kind of rules need to be put in place, and may help you determine which tool is the best one for each particular case. For example, imagine you have a two-tiered web application with web servers in one security group and a database in another. You could establish inbound NACL rules that allow external connections to your web servers from anywhere in the world (enabling port 443 connections) while strictly limiting access to your database (by only allowing port 3306 connections for MySQL). Look out for ineffective, redundant, and misconfigured deny rules Amazon recommends placing deny rules first in the sequential list of rules that your NACL enforces. Since you’re likely to enforce multiple deny rules per NACL (and multiple NACLs throughout your VPC), you’ll want to pay close attention to the order of those rules, looking for conflicts and misconfigurations that will impact your security posture. Similarly, you should pay close attention to the way security group rules interact with your NACLs. Even misconfigurations that are harmless from a security perspective may end up impacting the performance of your instance, or causing other problems. Regularly reviewing your rules is a good way to prevent these mistakes from occurring. Limit outbound traffic to the required ports or port ranges When creating a new NACL, you have the ability to apply inbound or outbound restrictions. There may be cases where you want to set outbound rules that allow traffic from all ports. Be careful, though. This may introduce vulnerabilities into your security posture. It’s better to limit access to the required ports, or to specify the corresponding port range for outbound rules. This establishes the principle of least privilege to outbound traffic and limits the risk of unauthorized access that may occur at the subnet level. Test your security posture frequently and verify the results How do you know if your particular combination of security groups and NACLs is optimal? Testing your architecture is a vital step towards making sure you haven’t left out any glaring vulnerabilities. It also gives you a good opportunity to address misconfiguration risks. This doesn’t always mean actively running penetration tests with experienced red team consultants, although that’s a valuable way to ensure best-in-class security. It also means taking time to validate your rules by running small tests with an external device. Consider using AWS flow logs to trace the way your rules direct traffic and using that data to improve your work. How to diagnose security group rules and NACL rules with flow logs Flow logs allow you to verify whether your firewall rules follow security best practices effectively. You can follow data ingress and egress and observe how data interacts with your AWS security rule architecture at each step along the way. This gives you clear visibility into how efficient your route tables are, and may help you configure your internet gateways for optimal performance. Before you can use the Flow Log CLI, you will need to create an IAM role that includes a policy granting users the permission to create, configure, and delete flow logs. Flow logs are available at three distinct levels, each accessible through its own console: Network interfaces VPCs Subnets You can use the ping command from an external device to test the way your instance’s security group and NACLs interact. Your security group rules (which are stateful) will allow the response ping from your instance to go through. Your NACL rules (which are stateless) will not allow the outbound ping response to travel back to your device. You can look for this activity through a flow log query. Here is a quick tutorial on how to create a flow log query to check your AWS security policies. First you’ll need to create a flow log in the AWS CLI. This is an example of a flow log query that captures all rejected traffic for a specified network interface. It delivers the flow logs to a CloudWatch log group with permissions specified in the IAM role: aws ec2 create-flow-logs \ –resource-type NetworkInterface \ –resource-ids eni-1235b8ca123456789 \ –traffic-type ALL \ –log-group-name my-flow-logs \ –deliver-logs-permission-arn arn:aws:iam::123456789101:role/publishFlowLogs Assuming your test pings represent the only traffic flowing between your external device and EC2 instance, you’ll get two records that look like this: 2 123456789010 eni-1235b8ca123456789 203.0.113.12 172.31.16.139 0 0 1 4 336 1432917027 1432917142 ACCEPT OK 2 123456789010 eni-1235b8ca123456789 172.31.16.139 203.0.113.12 0 0 1 4 336 1432917094 1432917142 REJECT OK To parse this data, you’ll need to familiarize yourself with flow log syntax. Default flow log records contain 14 arguments, although you can also expand custom queries to return more than double that number: Version tells you the version currently in use. Default flow logs requests use Version 2. Expanded custom requests may use Version 3 or 4. Account-id tells you the account ID of the owner of the network interface that traffic is traveling through. The record may display as unknown if the network interface is part of an AWS service like a Network Load Balancer. Interface-id shows the unique ID of the network interface for the traffic currently under inspection. Srcaddr shows the source of incoming traffic, or the address of the network interface for outgoing traffic. In the case of IPv4 addresses for network interfaces, it is always its private IPv4 address. Dstaddr shows the destination of outgoing traffic, or the address of the network interface for incoming traffic. In the case of IPv4 addresses for network interfaces, it is always its private IPv4 address. Srcport is the source port for the traffic under inspection. Dstport is the destination port for the traffic under inspection. Protocol refers to the corresponding IANA traffic protocol number . Packets describes the number of packets transferred. Bytes describes the number of bytes transferred. Start shows the start time when the first data packet was received. This could be up to one minute after the network interface transmitted or received the packet. End shows the time when the last data packet was received. This can be up to one minutes after the network interface transmitted or received the data packet. Action describes what happened to the traffic under inspection: ACCEPT means that traffic was allowed to pass. REJECT means the traffic was blocked, typically by security groups or NACLs. Log-status confirms the status of the flow log: OK means data is logging normally. NODATA means no network traffic to or from the network interface was detected during the specified interval. SKIPDATA means some flow log records are missing, usually due to internal capacity restraints or other errors. Going back to the example above, the flow log output shows that a user sent a command from a device with the IP address 203.0.113.12 to the network interface’s private IP address, which is 172.31.16.139. The security group’s inbound rules allowed the ICMP traffic to travel through, producing an ACCEPT record. However, the NACL did not let the ping response go through, because it is stateless. This generated the REJECT record that followed immediately after. If you configure your NACL to permit output ICMP traffic and run this test again, the second flow log record will change to ACCEPT. azon Web Services (AWS) is one of the most popular options for organizations looking to migrate their business applications to the cloud. It’s easy to see why: AWS offers high capacity, scalable and cost-effective storage, and a flexible, shared responsibility approach to security. Essentially, AWS secures the infrastructure, and you secure whatever you run on that infrastructure. However, this model does throw up some challenges. What exactly do you have control over? How can you customize your AWS infrastructure so that it isn’t just secure today, but will continue delivering robust, easily managed security in the future? The basics: security groups AWS offers virtual firewalls to organizations, for filtering traffic that crosses their cloud network segments. The AWS firewalls are managed using a concept called Security Groups. These are the policies, or lists of security rules, applied to an instance – a virtualized computer in the AWS estate. AWS Security Groups are not identical to traditional firewalls, and they have some unique characteristics and functionality that you should be aware of, and we’ve discussed them in detail in video lesson 1: the fundamentals of AWS Security Groups , but the crucial points to be aware of are as follows. First, security groups do not deny traffic – that is, all the rules in security groups are positive, and allow traffic. Second, while security group rules can be set to specify a traffic source, or a destination, they cannot specify both on the same rule. This is because AWS always sets the unspecified side (source or destination) as the instance to which the group is applied. Finally, single security groups can be applied to multiple instances, or multiple security groups can be applied to a single instance: AWS is very flexible. This flexibility is one of the unique benefits of AWS, allowing organizations to build bespoke security policies across different functions and even operating systems, mixing and matching them to suit their needs. Adding Network ACLs into the mix To further enhance and enrich its security filtering capabilities AWS also offers a feature called Network Access Control Lists (NACLs). Like security groups, each NACL is a list of rules, but there are two important differences between NACLs and security groups. The first difference is that NACLs are not directly tied to instances, but are tied with the subnet within your AWS virtual private cloud that contains the relevant instance. This means that the rules in a NACL apply to all of the instances within the subnet, in addition to all the rules from the security groups. So a specific instance inherits all the rules from the security groups associated with it, plus the rules associated with a NACL which is optionally associated with a subnet containing that instance. As a result NACLs have a broader reach, and affect more instances than a security group does. The second difference is that NACLs can be written to include an explicit action, so you can write ‘deny’ rules – for example to block traffic from a particular set of IP addresses which are known to be compromised. The ability to write ‘deny’ actions is a crucial part of NACL functionality. It’s all about the order As a consequence, when you have the ability to write both ‘allow’ rules and ‘deny’ rules, the order of the rules now becomes important. If you switch the order of the rules between a ‘deny’ and ‘allow’ rule, then you’re potentially changing your filtering policy quite dramatically. To manage this, AWS uses the concept of a ‘rule number’ within each NACL. By specifying the rule number, you can identify the correct order of the rules for your needs. You can choose which traffic you deny at the outset, and which you then actively allow. As such, with NACLs you can manage security tasks in a way that you cannot do with security groups alone. However, we did point out earlier that an instance inherits security rules from both the security groups, and from the NACLs – so how do these interact? The order by which rules are evaluated is this; For inbound traffic, AWS’s infrastructure first assesses the NACL rules. If traffic gets through the NACL, then all the security groups that are associated with that specific instance are evaluated, and the order in which this happens within and among the security groups is unimportant because they are all ‘allow’ rules. For outbound traffic, this order is reversed: the traffic is first evaluated against the security groups, and then finally against the NACL that is associated with the relevant subnet. You can see me explain this topic in person in my new whiteboard video: Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

  • Stop hunting after the breach - AlgoSec

    Stop hunting after the breach WhitePaper Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue Talk to a Skybox transition expert. Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • Vulnerability scanning

    Vulnerability scanning is only half the battle. Explore the difference between different types of scans, common pitfalls in modern cloud environments, and how to turn scan data into actionable security policies. Vulnerability scanning Select a size Which network Can AlgoSec be used for continuous compliance monitoring? Yes, AlgoSec supports continuous compliance monitoring. As organizations adapt their security policies to meet emerging threats and address new vulnerabilities, they must constantly verify these changes against the compliance frameworks they subscribe to. AlgoSec can generate risk assessment reports and conduct internal audits on-demand, allowing compliance officers to monitor compliance performance in real-time. Security professionals can also use AlgoSec to preview and simulate proposed changes to the organization’s security policies. This gives compliance officers a valuable degree of lead-time before planned changes impact regulatory guidelines and allows for continuous real-time monitoring. What is vulnerability scanning? Vulnerability scanning is the automated inspection of IT system attributes, applications, servers, ports, endpoints, and configuration parameters to detect weaknesses before adversaries find and exploit them. With increasingly sophisticated adversaries and costly breaches, organizations must be proactive. Vulnerability scanning is the cornerstone of this approach, giving companies an edge in defending their assets and operations against malicious actors. Vulnerability scanning vs. vulnerability management As the first step in the vulnerability management lifecycle, vulnerability scanning provides a snapshot of a cloud or IT infrastructure, generating baseline data for remediation, system validation, and improvement. This allows an organization to get ahead of threat actors performing their own reconnaissance. Vulnerability management, on the other hand, is a continuous governance process that encompasses the entire lifecycle: asset discovery, risk assessment, prioritization, remediation, validation, and reporting. Scanning is the tactical instrument; management is the strategic framework. How does a vulnerability scan work? A scan works much like reconnaissance, leveraging either: Passive techniques , which only observe and log configurations and asset inventories or Active but safe engagement with systems to identify open ports and missing security patches How do scanners “see” flaws? Vulnerability scanners inspect IT assets and detect vulnerabilities by matching their fingerprints against known vulnerability signatures from authoritative sources, including open-source databases (e.g., CISA’s Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and NIST’s National Vulnerability Database (NVD) ) and proprietary databases (e.g., Qualys and Tenable ). A scanner interacts with databases using the Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language (OVAL) . This standardized framework describes vulnerabilities, configurations, and system states so that scanners can compare their detection with vulnerabilities logged in databases. A scanner’s detection workflow includes: Fingerprinting: Collects signatures of IT assets, e.g., operating system type, patch level, installed software versions, service configurations, etc. Signature matching: Compares fingerprints against OVAL definitions or proprietary vulnerability databases Correlation logic (advanced): Applies logical rules to reduce false positives, e.g., no report for an Apache 2.4.38 vulnerability if the system runs Apache 2.4.50 with the relevant patch Confidence scoring: Generates confidence levels indicating detection certainty, helping analysts prioritize validation efforts Benefits of vulnerability scanning A snapshot of an organization’s vulnerability landscape has multiple advantages. Proactive vulnerability detection Scanning identifies security gaps before malicious actors exploit them. Find and fix an SQL injection vulnerability during routine scanning cycles—not after an unauthorized database exfiltration. Efficient risk management Businesses can prioritize risks based on a scanner’s generated vulnerability landscape. Security teams can then focus on fixing high-severity vulnerabilities for critical assets rather than applying uniform patching across all systems. Efficiency brings time and cost savings as well. This is critical, given IBM’s most recent average cost estimate for a breach stands at $4.4 million. Automated scanning helps businesses limit the vulnerabilities that lead to such incidents and their financial fallout. Regulatory compliance & enhanced security posture Vulnerability scanning is now an explicit cybersecurity requirement across multiple regulatory frameworks. Continuous scanning creates a feedback loop that improves baseline security. As vulnerabilities are identified and remediated, the overall attack surface shrinks, increasing operational costs for adversaries while reducing organizational risk exposure. What does a vulnerability scan entail? The vulnerability scanning process follows four steps. 1. Scope definition This involves determining IP ranges, hostnames, and FQDNs and DNS-resolvable targets for web applications and cloud resources. This step also differentiates systems by their criticality to business operations and excludes systems that cannot tolerate scanning. 2. Discovery & fingerprinting Before vulnerability identification begins, scanners must understand the target environment. This starts with identifying active systems, analyzing their behavior, logging their services, and retrieving their versions from service banners and application-specific queries. 3. Vulnerability probing The scanner compares service versions against known vulnerable configurations. It then evaluates their security settings or patch level to determine if those systems lack critical security updates. 4. Reporting & raw data export This final phase is where a scanner takes its findings and turns them into actionable intelligence. For many scanners, this involves assigning CVSS scores (0-10) to quantify vulnerability impact. This report then feeds into the broader vulnerability management workflow. Is there only 1 type of vulnerability scanning? Vulnerability scanning is not limited to one form. In fact, there are eight major types to choose from: External vulnerability scans assess an attack surface from outside the corporate network perimeter, targeting cloud assets, public-facing web applications, and internet-exposed infrastructure. Internal vulnerability scans simulate the perspective of an authenticated user or an attacker with initial access to uncover opportunities for lateral movement, vectors for privilege escalation, or segmentation failures. Credentialed scans authenticate to target systems using legitimate credentials to provide "inside-out" visibility and reduce false positives. Uncredentialed scans operate without authentication, relying on external observation. These scans can carry higher false-positive rates because they cannot detect local vulnerabilities or audit system configurations. Network scans focus on infrastructure vulnerabilities, e.g., network devices, protocols, and services, to identify vulnerabilities that may enable lateral movement and man-in-the-middle attacks. Database scans check relational and NoSQL database systems for weak authentication, excessive privileges, configuration errors, and unpatched database engines. Website scans , aka dynamic application security testing (DAST), probe web apps for real-time vulnerabilities via the HTTP interface, e.g., injection flaws, authentication bypass, and security misconfigurations. Host-based scans deploy agents on endpoints (workstations, servers) for continuous vulnerability assessment, identifying new vulnerabilities as software is installed or updated. Limitations of Vulnerability Scanning Getting ahead of an adversary gives companies an edge in what is a volatile ecosystem. However, vulnerability scanning is by no means a comprehensive security practice. Let’s discuss why. Zero-day vulnerabilities Vulnerability scanners rely on known vulnerability fingerprints. So what happens when they encounter a strange pattern? Zero-day vulnerabilities, or new flaws unknown to vendors and security researchers, are invisible to signature-based detection, which means they can slip through and lead to incidents. Misconfiguration blindspots This is another limitation tied to only being able to identify known software vulnerabilities. Scanners struggle with business-logic flaws and complex misconfigurations, such as custom application logic errors, context-dependent weaknesses, and cloud-specific misconfigurations. Authentication challenges Many vulnerability scanners rely on remote or network-level assessments to detect system flaws. While they may detect exposed assets and services, they cannot access internal configurations or workflows. No behavioral insight Vulnerability scanners assess impressions and signatures, not behavior or activity . Without covering how systems handle actual inputs in real-world operations or an attack, the scanner may miss critical vulnerabilities and underestimate real-time risks. From bulk scanning to "context-aware" discovery Traditional vulnerability management follows a simple CVSS-centric approach: Identify all vulnerabilities, rank them by severity score (0-10), and patch from highest to lowest. But a CVSS score of 9.8 only answers "How bad could exploitation be?" rather than "How likely is exploitation?" Introducing smart scanning Smart scanning combines traditional vulnerability identification with threat intelligence, business context, and exploitation likelihood. It prioritizes vulnerabilities based on business risk rather than theoretical severity. The Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) is a data-driven model that estimates the probability of vulnerability exploitation in the next 30 days. A vulnerability with a 9.0 CVSS but a 0.1% EPSS receives lower priority than a 7.0 CVSS vulnerability with an 85% EPSS. Scan smart with AlgoSec AppViz Traditional vulnerability scanners answer one question: "What vulnerabilities exist?" AlgoSec AppViz answers the operationally critical follow-up: "Which vulnerabilities can attackers actually reach?" AlgoSec AppViz delivers business-specific value by prioritizing a detected vulnerability risk not only by severity but also by business criticality. This saves you precious time by generating actionable reports that better protect your business. Are you ready to move beyond traditional vulnerability scanning? Schedule a demo of AlgoSec today. Get the latest insights from the experts Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

  • AlgoSec security management solution for Cisco ACI | AlgoSec

    Streamline security management for Cisco ACI with AlgoSec's solution, offering visibility, policy automation, and risk management for your network infrastructure. AlgoSec security management solution for Cisco ACI ---- ------- Schedule a Demo Select a size ----- Get the latest insights from the experts Choose a better way to manage your network

bottom of page