Search results

As the most widely adapted open-source container software, Kubernetes provides businesses with efficient processes to schedule, deploy,... Cloud Security Understanding and Preventing Kubernetes Attacks and Threats Ava Chawla 2 min read Ava Chawla Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 10/20/21 Published As the most widely adapted open-source container software, Kubernetes provides businesses with efficient processes to schedule, deploy, and scale containers across different machines. The bad news is that cybercriminals have figured out how to exploit the platform’s vulnerabilities , resulting in catastrophic network intrusions across many company infrastructures. A recent report revealed that 94% of respondents reported security incidents in Kubernetes environments. The question is, what is behind this surge of Kubernetes attacks, and how can they be prevented? How Kubernetes is Vulnerable As a container-based platform, a new set of vulnerabilities, permission issues, and specific images set the stage for the increase in attacks. The threats have included fileless malware in containers, leveraging misconfigured Docker API ports, and using container images for attacks. Misconfigured Docker API Ports Exploitation Scanning for misconfigured Docker API ports and using them for deploying images containing malware is a relatively new type of attack. The malware, designed to evade static scanning, has become a popular method to hijack compute cycles for fraudulent cryptomining. This cryptojacking activity steals CPU power to mine currencies such as Ethereum and Monero. By first identifying vulnerable front-end websites and other systems, attackers send a command through the application layer simply by manipulating a domain’s text field or through an exposed API in the website’s URL. The code then enters the container, where it is executed with commands sent to a Docker container’s shell. A wget command is executed to download the malware. To protect against this attack, enterprises must ensure their container files are not writable, establish CPU consumption limits, and enable alerts to detect interactive shell launches. DDoS Attacks With Open Docker Daemons Cybercriminals use misconfigured open Docker daemons to launch DDoS attacks using a botnet of containers. UDP flood and Slowloris were recently identified as two such types of container-based botnet attacks. A recent blog describes an anatomy of these Kubernetes attacks. The attackers first identified open Docker daemons using a scanning tool such as Shodan to scan the internet for IP addresses and find a list of hosts, open ports, and services. By uploading their own dedicated images to the Docker hub, they succeeded in deploying and remotely running the images on the host. Analyzing how the UDP flood attack was orchestrated required an inspection of the binary with IDA. This revealed the start_flood and start_tick threads. The source code for the attack was found on Github. This code revealed a try_gb parameter, with the range of 0 to 1,024, used to configure how much data to input to flood the target. However, it was discovered that attackers are able to modify this open-source code to create a self-compiled binary that floods the host with even greater amounts of UDP packets. In the case of the Slowloris attack, cybercriminals launched DDoS with the slowhttptest utility. The attackers were able to create a self-compiling binary that is unidentifiable in malware scans. Protection from these Kubernetes attacks requires vigilant assurance policies and prevention of images other than compliant ones to run in the system. Non-compliant images will then be blocked when intrusion attempts are made. Man in the Middle Attacks With LoadBalancer or ExternalIPs An attack affecting all versions of Kubernetes involves multi-tenant clusters. The most vulnerable clusters have tenants that are able to create and update services and pods. In this breach, the attacker can intercept traffic from other pods or nodes in the cluster by creating a ClusterIP service and setting the spec.externalIP’s field. Additionally, a user who is able to patch the status of a LoadBalancer service can grab traffic. The only way to mitigate this threat is to restrict access to vulnerable features. This can be done with the admission webhook container, externalip-webhook , which prevents services from using random external IPs. An alternative method is to lock external IPs with OPA Gatekeeper with this sample Constraint Templatecan. Siloscape Malware Security researcher, Daniel Prizmant, describes a newer malware attack that he calls Siloscape. Its primary goal is to escape the container that is mainly implemented in Windows server silo. The malware targets Kubernetes through Windows containers to open a backdoor into poorly configured clusters to run the malicious containers. While other malware attacks focus on cryptojacking, the Siloscape user’s motive is to go undetected and open a backdoor to the cluster for a variety of malicious activities. This is possible since Siloscape is virtually undetectable due to a lack of readable strings in the binary. This type of attack can prove catastrophic. It compromises an entire cluster running multiple cloud applications. Cybercriminals can access critical information including sign-ins, confidential files, and complete databases hosted inside the cluster. Additionally, organizations using Kubernetes clusters for testing and development can face catastrophic damage should these environments be breached. To prevent a Siloscape attack, it is crucial that administrators ensure their Kubernetes clusters are securely configured. This will prevent the malware from creating new deployments and force Siloscape to exit. Microsoft also recommends using only Hyper-V containers as a security boundary for anything relying on containerization. The Threat Matrix The MITRE ATT&CK database details additional tactics and techniques attackers are using to infiltrate Kubernetes environments to access sensitive information, mine cryptocurrency, perform DDoS attacks, and other unscrupulous activities. The more commonly used methods are as follows: 1. Kubernetes file compromise Because this file holds sensitive data such as cluster credentials, an attacker could easily gain initial access to the entire cluster. Only accept kubeconfig files from trusted sources. Others should be thoroughly inspected before they are deployed. 2. Using similar pod names Attackers create similar pod names and use random suffixes to hide them in the cluster. The pods then run malicious code and obtain access to many other resources. 3. Kubernetes Secrets intrusion Attackers exploit any misconfigurations in the cluster with the goal of accessing the API server and retrieving information from the Secrets objects. 4. Internal network access Attackers able to access a single pod that communicates with other pods or applications can move freely within the cluster to achieve their goals. 5. Using the writeable hostPath mount Attackers with permissions to create new containers can create one with a writeable hostPath volume. Kubernetes Attacks: Key Takeaways Kubernetes brings many advantages to organizations but also presents a variety of security risks, as documented above. However, by ensuring their environments are adequately protected through proper configuration and appropriately assigned permissions, the threat of Kubernetes attacks is greatly minimized. Should a container be compromised, properly assigned privileges can severely limit a cluster-wide compromise. Prevasio assists companies in the management of their cloud security through built-in vulnerability and anti-malware scans for containers. Contact us for more information on our powerful CSPM solutions. Learn about how we can protect your company from Kubernetes attacks and other cyberattacks. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

Ensuring your cloud environment is secure and compliant with industry practices is critical. Cloud security best practices will help you... Cloud Security 16 Best Practices for Cloud Security (Complete List for 2023) Rony Moshkovich 2 min read Rony Moshkovich Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 4/27/23 Published Ensuring your cloud environment is secure and compliant with industry practices is critical. Cloud security best practices will help you protect your organization’s data and applications. In the process, reduce the risks of security compromise. This post will walk you through the best practices for cloud security. We’ll also share the top cloud security risks and how to mitigate them. The top 5 security risks to cloud computing right now Social engineering. Social engineering attackers use psychological deception to manipulate users into providing sensitive information. These deception tactics may include phishing, pretexting, or baiting. Account compromise. An account compromise occurs when an attacker obtains unauthorized entry to it. A hacker can access your account when you use weak passwords or steal your credentials. They may introduce malware or steal your files once they access your account. Shadow IT. This security risk occurs when your employee uses hardware or software that the IT department does not approve. It may result in compliance problems, data loss, and a higher risk of cyberattacks. Insider activity (unintentional or malicious) . Insider activity occurs when approved users damage your company’s data or network. These users can either do it purposefully or accidentally on-premises. For example, you may disclose private information unintentionally or steal data on purpose. Insecure APIs . APIs make communication easier for cloud services and other software applications. Insecure APIs can allow unauthorized access to sensitive data. This could, in turn, lead to malicious attacks, such as data theft. The attackers could also do illegal data alteration from data centers. 16 best practices for cloud security Establish zero-trust architecture Use role-based access control Monitor suspicious activity Monitor privileged users Encrypt data in motion and at rest Investigate shadow IT applications Protect Endpoints Educate employees about threats Create and enforce a password policy Implement multi-factor authentication Understand the shared responsibility model m Audit IaaS configurations Review SLAs and contracts. Maintaining logs and monitoring Use vulnerability and penetration testing Consider intrusion detection and prevention One of the most critical areas of cloud security is identity and access management. We will also discuss sensitive data protection, social engineering attacks, cloud deployments, and incident response. Best practices for managing access. Access control is an integral part of cloud network security. It restricts who can access cloud services, what they can do with the data, and when. Here are some of the best practices for managing access: Establish zero-trust architecture Zero-trust architecture is a security concept that treats all traffic in or out of your network as untrusted. It considers that every request may be malicious. So you must verify your request, even if it originates from within the network. You can apply zero-trust architecture by dividing the system into smaller, more secure cloud zones. And then enforce strict access policies for each zone. This best practice will help you understand who accesses your cloud services. You’ll also know what they do with your data resources. Use role-based access control Role-based access control allows you to assign users different access rights based on their roles. This method lessens the chances of giving people unauthorized access privileges. It also simplifies the administration of access rights. RBAC also simplifies upholding the tenet of least privilege. It restricts user permission to only the resources they need to do their jobs. This way, users don’t have excessive access that attackers could exploit. Monitor suspicious activity Monitoring suspicious behavior involves tracking and analyzing user activity in a cloud environment. It helps identify odd activities, such as user accounts accessing unauthorized data. You should also set up alerts for suspicious activities. Adopting this security strategy will help you spot security incidents early and react quickly. This best practice will help you improve your cloud functionality. It will also protect your sensitive data from unwanted access or malicious activities. Monitor privileged users Privileged users have high-level access rights and permissions. They can create, delete and modify data in the cloud environment. You should consider these users as a huge cybersecurity risk. Your privileged users can cause significant harm if they get compromised. Closely watch these users’ access rights and activity. By doing so, you’ll easily spot misuse of permissions and avert data breaches. You can also use privileged access management systems (PAS) to control access to privileged accounts. Enforcing security certifications also helps privileged users avoid making grievous mistakes. They’ll learn the actions that can pose a cybersecurity threat to their organization. Best practices for protecting sensitive data Safeguarding sensitive data is critical for organizational security. You need security measures to secure the cloud data you store, process and transfer. Encrypt data in motion and at rest Encrypting cloud data in transit and at rest is critical to data security. When you encrypt your data, it transforms into an unreadable format. So only authorized users with a decryption key can make it readable again. This way, cybercriminals will not access your sensitive data. To protect your cloud data in transit, use encryption protocols like TSL and SSL. And for cloud data at rest, use powerful encryption algorithms like AES and RSA. Investigate shadow IT applications Shadow IT apps can present a security risk as they often lack the same level of security as sanctioned apps. Investigating Shadow IT apps helps ensure they do not pose any security risks. For example, some staff may use cloud storage services that are insecure. If you realize that, you can propose sanctioned cloud storage software as a service apps like Dropbox and Google Drive. You can also use software asset management tools to monitor the apps in your environment. A good example is the SaaS solution known as Flexera software asset management. Protect Endpoints Endpoints are essential in maintaining a secure cloud infrastructure. They can cause a huge security issue if you don’t monitor them closely. Computers and smartphones are often the weakest points in your security strategy. So, hackers target them the most because of their high vulnerability. Cybercriminals may then introduce ransomware into your cloud through these endpoints. To protect your endpoints, employ security solutions like antimalware and antivirus software. You could also use endpoint detection and response systems (EDRs) to protect your endpoints from threats. EDRs use firewalls as a barrier between the endpoints and the outside world. These firewalls will monitor and block suspicious traffic from accessing your endpoints in real time. Best practices for preventing social engineering attacks Use these best practices to protect your organization from social engineering attacks: Educate employees about threats Educating workers on the techniques that attackers use helps create a security-minded culture. Your employees will be able to detect malicious attempts and respond appropriately. You can train them on deception techniques such as phishing, baiting, and pretexting. Also, make it your policy that every employee takes security certifications on a regular basis. You can tell them to report anything they suspect to be a security threat to the IT department. They’ll be assured that your security team can handle any security issues they may face. Create and enforce a password policy A password policy helps ensure your employees’ passwords are secure and regularly updated. It also sets up rules everyone must follow when creating and using passwords. Some rules in your password policy can be: Setting a minimum password length when creating passwords. No reusing of passwords. The frequency with which to change passwords. The characteristics of a strong password. A strong password policy safeguards your cloud-based operations from social engineering assaults. Implement multi-factor authentication Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security to protect the users’ accounts. This security tool requires users to provide extra credentials to access their accounts. For example, you may need a one-time code sent via text or an authentication app to log into your account. This extra layer of protection reduces the chances of unauthorized access to accounts. Hackers will find it hard to steal sensitive data even if they have your password. In the process, you’ll prevent data loss from your cloud platform. Leverage the multifactor authentication options that public cloud providers usually offer. For example, Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers multifactor authentication for its users. Best practices for securing your cloud deployments. Your cloud deployments are as secure or insecure as the processes you use to manage them. This is especially true for multi-cloud environments where the risks are even higher. Use these best practices to secure your cloud deployments: Understand the shared responsibility model The shared responsibility model is a concept that drives cloud best practices. It states that cloud providers and customers are responsible for different security aspects. Cloud service providers are responsible for the underlying infrastructure and its security. On the other hand, customers are responsible for their apps, data, and settings in the cloud. Familiarize yourself with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure guides. This ensures you’re aware of the roles of your cloud service provider. Understanding the shared security model will help safeguard your cloud platform. Audit IaaS configurations Cloud deployments of workloads are prone to misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. So it’s important to regularly audit your Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) configurations. Check that all IaaS configurations align with industry best practices and security standards. Regularly check for weaknesses, misconfigurations, and other security vulnerabilities. This best practice is critical if you are using a multi-cloud environment. The level of complexity arises, which in turn increases the risk of attacks. Auditing IaaS configurations will secure your valuable cloud data and assets from potential cyberattacks. Review SLAs and contracts. Reviewing SLAs and contracts is a crucial best practice for safeguarding cloud installations. It ensures that all parties know their respective security roles. You should review SLAs to ensure cloud deployments meet your needs while complying with industry standards. Examining the contracts also helps you identify potential risks, like data breaches. This way, you prepare elaborate incident responses. Best practices for incident response Cloud environments are dynamic and can quickly become vulnerable to cyberattacks. So your security/DevOps team should design incident response plans to resolve potential security incidents. Here are some of the best practices for incident response: Maintaining logs and monitoring Maintaining logs and monitoring helps you spot potential cybersecurity threats in real time. In the process, enable your security to respond quickly using the right security controls. Maintaining logs involves tracking all the activities that occur in a system. In your cloud environment, it can record login attempts, errors, and other network activity. Monitoring your network activity lets you easily spot a breach’s origin and damage severity. Use vulnerability and penetration testing Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing can help you identify weaknesses in your cloud. These tests mimic attacks on a company’s cloud infrastructure to find vulnerabilities that cybercriminals may exploit. Through automation, these security controls can assist in locating security flaws, incorrect setups, and other weaknesses early. You can then measure the adequacy of your security policies to address these flaws. This will let you know if your cloud security can withstand real-life incidents. Vulnerability and penetration testing is a crucial best practice for handling incidents in cloud security. It may dramatically improve your organization’s overall security posture. Consider intrusion detection and prevention Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) are essential to a robust security strategy. Intrusion detection involves identifying potential cybersecurity threats in your network. Through automation, intrusion detection tools monitor your network traffic in real-time for suspicious activity. Intrusion prevention systems (IPS) go further by actively blocking malicious activity. These security tools can help prevent any harm by malware attacks in your cloud environment. The bottom line on cloud security. You must enforce best practices to keep your cloud environment secure. This way, you’ll lower the risks of cyberattacks which can have catastrophic results. A CSPM tool like Prevasio can help you enforce your cloud security best practices in many ways. It can provide visibility into your cloud environment and help you identify misconfigurations. Prevasio can also allow you to set up automated security policies to apply across the entire cloud environment. This ensures your cloud users abide by all your best practices for cloud security. So if you’re looking for a CSPM tool to help keep your cloud environment safe, try Prevasio today! Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

AlgoSec Horizon Security Analyzer delivers visibility analysis of your network applications across your hybrid network Identify compliance gaps Visualize & manage hybrid networks Enable visibility across your hybrid network, optimize firewall rules, and prioritize risks. Schedule a demo Watch a video Visualize your entire network Instantly visualize your entire hybrid network security topology – in the cloud, on-premises, and everything in between. Understand the impact of network security policies on traffic, quickly troubleshoot connectivity issues, plan changes, and perform “what-if” traffic queries. Learn more Optimize the discovery of applications and services Never misplace an application on your network with new AI-powered and enhanced application discovery. Leverage advanced AI to identify your business applications, their utilized resources, and network connectivity accurately. Connect applications to security policy rules Firewall rules support applications or processes that require network connectivity to and from specific servers, users, and networks. With AppViz, automatically associate the relevant business applications that each firewall rule supports, enabling you to review the firewall rules quickly and easily. Read more Micro-segment successfully Master micro-segmentation. Define and enforce network segmentation throughout your entire hybrid network. Be confident that your network security policies don’t violate your network segmentation strategy. Clear answers in clear language Get the answers to your network security policies in plain English. Use AlgoBot, an intelligent chatbot that assists with change management processes. Reduce ticket resolution time by giving other parts of your organization the tools they need to get immediate answers. Always be compliant Identify compliance gaps across your entire hybrid network, so you can stay continuously in compliance. Identify exactly which application and security policy is potentially non-compliant. Always be ready for audits with compliance reports covering leading regulations and custom corporate policies. Identify risky rules Identify risky security policy rules, the assets they expose, and if they’re in use. Prioritize risk based on what your business values most — the applications powering your network. Map, clean up and reduce risk Clean up and optimize your security policy. Uncover unused, duplicate, overlapping,or expired rules, consolidate and reorder rules, and tighten overly permissive “ANY” rules -- without impacting business requirements. End-to-end security management Automation is only one piece of a robust security policy. See how our full solution suite completes the picture. Horizon FireFlow Automate and secure
policy changes Process security changes in a fraction of the time by automating the entire security policy change process. Horizon FireFlow AlgoSec Cloud Effortless cloud management Security management across the multi-cloud and multi-vendor estate AlgoSec Cloud solution Horizon AppViz Optimize the discovery of applications and services Leverage advanced AI to identify your business applications and their network connectivity accurately. AppViz solution Equip yourself with the technical details to discuss with your team and managers Ready for a deep dive? Contact us today Got everything you need?
Here’s how you get started How to buy Download now Get the conversation started by sharing it with your team Solution brochure Browse now Take a deep breath.
You’re about to dive deep! Tech docs Watch the video "I found the product to be the best rule review solution in the market What they say about us Manager AlgoSec’s Firewall Analyzer enables you to instantly visualize your entire hybrid, by pulling pulls information from a wide range of devices and providing you network security topology. Firewall Analyzer helps you assess the impact of network security policies on traffic, troubleshoot connectivity issues, plan changes and perform “what-if” traffic queries. Firewall Analyzer seamlessly integrates with all leading brands of traditional and next generation firewalls and cloud security controls as well as routers, load balancers and web proxies. What is Firewall Analyzer? Firewall Analyzer rule management enables the process of optimizing firewall rules by identifying and removing redundant firewall rules, aligning firewall rule policies with government and industry regulations and preventing inappropriate firewall rule modifications. Firewall Analyzer discovers and prioritizes all risks  and their associated rules and associated applications in your network security policy. Can I analyze my firewall rules? Firewall Analyzer provides pre-populated, audit-ready compliance reports with an overview of events and changes associated with a firewall. Firewall Analyzer automatically analyzes the existing device rule base to identify unused, duplicate or expired rules and then provides recommendations to remove, reorder or consolidate similar rules. Firewall Analyzer optimizes firewall rulesets. Does Firewall Analyzer work with Cisco? The main use of a firewall monitoring tool is to ensure full network visibility. Firewall Analyzer provides you a unified view of all the applications, services and their connectivity flows within an enterprise computer network. What are the main uses of a firewall monitoring tool? Firewall Analyzer includes firewall analysis tools to help you to identify enterprise applications, services and connectivity flows to track events and policy changes in order to clean up and optimize firewall configuration and maintain compliance standards. Can I analyze my firewall’s configuration? Firewall Analyzer provides pre-populated, audit-ready compliance reports with an overview of events and changes associated with a firewall. Firewall Analyzer automatically analyzes the existing device rule base to identify unused, duplicate or expired rules and then provides recommendations to remove, reorder or consolidate similar rules. Firewall Analyzer optimizes firewall rulesets. Can I monitor my firewall changes? FAQ Get the latest insights from the experts The 100x Revolution, learn how to Future-Proof your business applications with Secure Application Connectivity. Anywhere. Download the eBook Case Study- Nationwide Testimonial - AlgoSec Watch it now Product introduction video- Learn the key capabilities of the AlgoSec Secure application connectivity platform. Watch it now Schedule time with a Firewall Analyzer expert Schedule time with a Firewall Analyzer expert Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Explore upcoming Algosec events to learn about the latest in network security, policy management, and compliance from industry experts Events Exhibition Frankfurt May 22, 2024 - May 23, 2024 Cloud and Cyber Expo – Frankfurt Messe Frankfurt Booth L070 Hall 8 Read More AlgoSec Events London June 05, 2024 Algocity London Good Hotel Western Gateway, Royal Victoria Dock London, E16 1FA 5th of June, 6PM. Read More Exhibition National Harbor, MD June 03, 2024 - June 05, 2024 Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit – US Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center, National Harbor, MD Read More Exhibition London June 04, 2024 - June 06, 2024 Infosec London Booth B69 Read More Exhibition Las Vegas June 02, 2024 - June 06, 2024 Cisco Live US 2024 Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV Booth 5960 in World of Solutions Read More Exhibition Philadelphia June 10-12, 2024 AWS re:Inforce Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA AlgoSec Booth: 501 Read More Exhibit, Speaking Session Las Vegas August 27-29, 2024 Cisco GSX FY25 Mandalay Bay Hotel, Las Vegas, NV Booth number: 23 Read More Exhibition Bengaluru August 30th, 2024 Dine With DevOps Sheraton Grand Whitefield Hotel, Bengaluru Read More AlgoSec Event Riyadh September 3rd, 2024 AlgoCity Riyadh Voco, Riyadh Read More AlgoSec Event Dubai September 5th, 2024 AlgoCity Dubai Ritz Carlton, JBR, Dubai Read More Exhibition Atlanta, GA, US September 5, 2024 Mission Security 2024 The Westin Atlanta Perimeter North, Atlanta, GA, US Read More Exhibition Riyadh September 10th, 2024 MENA ISC with Amiviz 2024 Hilton Riyadh Hotel & Residences, Riyadh Booth number – P01 Booth: Pod 4 Read More Exhibition Toronto September 11, 2024 AWS Summit Toronto 2024 Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto, Canada Booth number: 325 Read More Exhibition Montreal, QC, Canada September 11-12, 2024 GoSec 24 Palais des Congrès de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada Read More Exhibition Kansas City, MO, US September 18, 2024 2024 OptivCon Kansas City Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City, MO, US Read More Exhibition Monaco 9th – 12th October, 2024 Les Assises Monaco Booth number: B08 Read More Exhibition Singapore October 15th -17th GovWare Singapore Sands Expo and Convention Centre Booth number – F20 | Booth E Read More Exhibition Dubai October 14th -18th Gitex Dubai World Trade Center Booth number – Hall 24 | A45 | Booth 7 Read More Exhibition Nurenberg Messe 22nd – 24th October , 2024 IT-SA 2024 Nurenberg Messe Booth number 7A-614 Read More Exhibition Melbourne, MCEC November 11th -14th Nov CISCO Live Melbourne Booth number – Stand S1 Read More Exhibition Malham | Saudi Arabia November 26th -28th Nov Black HAT MEA Booth number – Hall 1 | G 10 | Booth 7 Read More AlgoSec Event Washington, DC June 10th, 2025 Gartner Happy Hour Event Washington, DC Read More Exhibition San Diego, CA 8-12 June, 2025 Cisco Live San Diego, CA San Diego, CA Booth #2041 Read More Exhibition Ontario, CA June 13th, 2025 CXO Cyber Training Day & Dinner Ontario, CA Read More Exhibition Indiana, US July 31st, 2025 (IN) Nug Indianapolis Indiana, US Read More Exhibit Atlanta August 20th, 2025 Mission: Security’ 25 Westin Atlanta Perimeter North, Atlanta, GA Read More Exhibit, Speaking Session Las Vegas 26-28 of August, 2025 Cisco GSX FY26 Mandalay Bay Hotel Read More Exhibit Minneapolis September 10th, 2025 OptivCon Minneapolis US Bank Stadium Read More Exhibit, Speaking Session Mexico City, Mexico September 30 – October 1, 2025 Infosecurity Mexico Centro Banamex, Mexico City, Mexico Read More AlgoSec Event Nurenburg October 7th, 2025 ITSA EXPO Nurenburg Read More Exhibition Monaco 8-11 October, 2025 Les Assises Monaco Read More Exhibition Dubai 13-17 October, 2025 GITEX Dubai Read More Exhibition Orlando, FL 27-29 October, 2025 InfoSec World Orlando, FL Read More Exhibit Philadelphia October 29th, 2025 GPSEC Philadelphia Convene, Philadelphia, PA Read More Exhibit Phoenix October 30, 2025 OptivCon Phoenix Phoenix, AR Read More Exhibit Wastlake October 29-31, 2025 ISS+ Cleveland Wastlake, Ohio Read More Exhibition Melbourne 10-13 November, 2025 Cisco Live Melbourne Read More Exhibition Riyadh 24-26 November, 2025 Black Hat Riyadh Read More Exhibit Philadelphia December 5th, 2025 B Sides Philly 2025 Live Casino Hotel, 900 Packer Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19148 Read More Exhibit Las Vegas, NV March 9-13th, 2026 Fortinet Acceleter Mandalay Bay Convention Center Read More Exhibit San Francisco, CA March 23-26th, 2026 RSA Conference 2026 Moscone Center Read More Exhibit Las Vegas, NV May 31-June 4th, 2026 Cisco Live 2026 Mandalay Bay Convention Center Read More Exhibit Vancouver, Canada 2. FutureCon Vancouver The Westin Bayshore, Vancouver Canada Read More Exhibit Virginia, USA June 9-10, 2026 RVASec 500 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, USA, 23219 Read More Summit Washington, DC June 30-July 1, 2026 2026 AWS Summit Walter E. Washington Convention Center Read More Region Event type Date No upcoming events. Visit us soon for new events Choose a better way to manage your network Choose a better way to manage your network Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Minimize risks and maximize benefits with a successful data center migration Explore key considerations and strategies Data center migration checklist + project plan template Select a size Which network Can AlgoSec be used for continuous compliance monitoring? Yes, AlgoSec supports continuous compliance monitoring. As organizations adapt their security policies to meet emerging threats and address new vulnerabilities, they must constantly verify these changes against the compliance frameworks they subscribe to. AlgoSec can generate risk assessment reports and conduct internal audits on-demand, allowing compliance officers to monitor compliance performance in real-time. Security professionals can also use AlgoSec to preview and simulate proposed changes to the organization’s security policies. This gives compliance officers a valuable degree of lead-time before planned changes impact regulatory guidelines and allows for continuous real-time monitoring. Data center migration What is a data center migration? What are the four types of data center migration? What are data center migration best practices? How to plan for a successful data center migration? What are some common challenges of a data center migration? What are some common drawbacks of a data center migration? Checklist for a successful data center migration What are some data center migration tools? Get the latest insights from the experts Use these six best practices to simplify compliance and risk mitigation with the AlgoSec White paper Learn how AlgoSec can help you pass PCI-DSS Audits and ensure Solution overview See how this customer improved compliance readiness and risk Case study Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

AlgoSec security management solution for Juniper Networks Solution Brief Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Attacks on water treatment plants show just how vulnerable critical infrastructure is to hacking – here’s how these vital services should... Cyber Attacks & Incident Response Stop hackers from poisoning the well: Protecting critical infrastructure against cyber-attacks Tsippi Dach 2 min read Tsippi Dach Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 3/31/21 Published Attacks on water treatment plants show just how vulnerable critical infrastructure is to hacking – here’s how these vital services should be protected. Criminals plotting to poison a city’s water supply is a recurring theme in TV and movie thrillers, such as 2005’s Batman Begins. But as we’ve seen recently, it’s more than just a plot device: it’s a cyber-threat which is all too real. During the past 12 months, there have been two high-profile attacks on water treatment systems that serve local populations, both with the aim of causing harm to citizens. The first was in April 2020, targeting a plant in Israel . Intelligence sources said that hackers gained access to the plant and tried altering the chlorine levels in drinking water – but luckily the attack was detected and stopped. And in early February, a hacker gained access to the water system of Oldsmar, Florida and tried to pump in a dangerous amount of sodium hydroxide. The hacker succeeded in starting to add the chemical, but luckily a worker spotted what was happening and reversed the action. But what could have happened if those timely interventions had not been made? These incidents are a clear reminder that critical national infrastructure is vulnerable to attacks – and that those attacks will keep on happening, with the potential to impact the lives of millions of people.  And of course, the Covid-19 pandemic has further highlighted how essential critical infrastructure is to our daily lives. So how can better security be built into critical infrastructure systems, to stop attackers being able to breach them and disrupt day-to-day operations?  It’s a huge challenge, because of the variety and complexity of the networks and systems in use across different industry sectors worldwide. Different systems but common security problems For example, in water and power utilities, there are large numbers of cyber-physical systems consisting of industrial equipment such as turbines, pumps and switches, which in turn are managed by a range of different industrial control systems (ICS). These were not designed with security in mind:  they are simply machines with computerized controllers that enact the instructions they receive from operators.  The communications between the operator and the controllers are done via IP-based networks – which, without proper network defenses, means they can be accessed over the Internet – which is the vector that hackers exploit. As such, irrespective of the differences between ICS controls, the security challenges for all critical infrastructure organizations are similar:  hackers must be stopped from being able to infiltrate networks; if they do succeed in breaching the organization’s defenses, they must be prevented from being able to move laterally across networks and gain access to critical systems. This means  network segmentation  is one of the core strategies for securing critical infrastructure, to keep operational systems separate from other networks in the organization and from the public Internet and surround them with security gateways so that they cannot be accessed by unauthorized people. In the attack examples we mentioned earlier, properly implemented segmentation would prevent a hacker from being able to access the PC which controls the water plant’s pumps and valves. With damaging ransomware attacks increasing over the past year, which also exploit internal network connections and pathways to spread rapidly and cause maximum disruption,  organizations should also employ security best-practices to block or limit the impact of ransomware attacks  on their critical systems. These best practices have not changed significantly since 2017’s massive WannaCry and NotPetya attacks, so organizations would be wise to check and ensure they are employing them on their own networks. Protecting critical infrastructure against cyber-attacks is a complex challenge because of the sheer diversity of systems in each sector.  However, the established security measures we’ve outlined here are extremely effective in protecting these vital systems – and in turn, protecting all of us. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

Update : Next two parts of the analysis are available here and here . As earlier reported by FireEye, the actors behind a global... Cloud Security Sunburst Backdoor: A Deeper Look Into The SolarWinds’ Supply Chain Malware Rony Moshkovich 2 min read Rony Moshkovich Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 12/15/20 Published Update : Next two parts of the analysis are available here and here . As earlier reported by FireEye, the actors behind a global intrusion campaign have managed to trojanise SolarWinds Orion business software updates in order to distribute malware. The original FireEye write-up already provides a detailed description of this malware. Nevertheless, as the malicious update SolarWinds-Core-v2019.4.5220-Hotfix5.msp was still available for download for hours since the FireEye’s post, it makes sense to have another look into the details of its operation. The purpose of this write-up is to provide new information, not covered in the original write-up. Any overlaps with the original description provided by FireEye are not intentional. For start, the malicious component SolarWinds.Orion.Core.BusinessLayer.dll inside the MSP package is a non-obfuscated .NET assembly. It can easily be reconstructed with a .NET disassembler, such as ILSpy , and then fully reproduced in C# code, using Microsoft Visual Studio. Once reproduced, it can be debugged to better understand how it works. In a nutshell, the malicious DLL is a backdoor. It is loaded into the address space of the legitimate SolarWinds Orion process SolarWinds.BusinessLayerHost.exe or SolarWinds.BusinessLayerHostx64.exe . The critical strings inside the backdoor’s class SolarWinds.Orion.Core.BusinessLayer.OrionImprovementBusinessLayer are encoded with the DeflateStream Class of the .NET’s System.IO.Compression library, coupled with the standard base64 encoder. Initialisation Once loaded, the malware checks if its assembly file was created earlier than 12, 13, or 14 days ago. The exact number of hours it checks is a random number from 288 to 336. Next, it reads the application settings value ReportWatcherRetry . This value keeps the reporting status, and may be set to one of the states: New (4) Truncate (3) Append (5) When the malware runs the first time, its reporting status variable ReportWatcherRetry is set to New (4) . The reporting status is an internal state that drives the logic. For example, if the reporting status is set to Truncate , the malware will stop operating by first disabling its networking communications, and then disabling other security tools and antivirus products. In order to stay silent, the malware periodically falls asleep for a random period of time that varies between 30 minutes and 2 hours. At the start, the malware obtains the computer’s domain name . If the domain name is empty, the malware quits. It then generates a 8-byte User ID, which is derived from the system footprint. In particular, it is generated from MD5 hash of a string that consists from the 3 fields: the first or default operational (can transmit data packets) network interface’s physical address computer’s domain name UUID created by Windows during installation (machine’s unique ID) Even though it looks random, the User ID stays permanent as long as networking configuration and the Windows installation stay the same. Domain Generation Algorithm The malware relies on its own CryptoHelper class to generate a domain name. This class is instantiated from the 8-byte User ID and the computer’s domain name, encoded with a substitution table: “rq3gsalt6u1iyfzop572d49bnx8cvmkewhj” . For example, if the original domain name is “ domain “, its encoded form will look like: “ n2huov “. To generate a new domain, the malware first attempts to resolve domain name “ api.solarwinds.com “. If it fails to resolve it, it quits. The first part of the newly generated domain name is a random string, produced from the 8-byte User ID, a random seed value, and encoded with a custom base64 alphabet “ph2eifo3n5utg1j8d94qrvbmk0sal76c” . Because it is generated from a random seed value, the first part of the newly generated domain name is random. For example, it may look like “ fivu4vjamve5vfrt ” or “ k1sdhtslulgqoagy “. To produce the domain name, this string is then appended with the earlier encoded domain name (such as “ n2huov “) and a random string, selected from the following list: .appsync-api.eu-west-1[.]avsvmcloud[.]com .appsync-api.us-west-2[.]avsvmcloud[.]com .appsync-api.us-east-1[.]avsvmcloud[.]com .appsync-api.us-east-2[.]avsvmcloud[.]com For example, the final domain name may look like: fivu4vjamve5vfrtn2huov[.]appsync-api.us-west-2[.]avsvmcloud[.]com or k1sdhtslulgqoagyn2huov[.]appsync-api.us-east-1[.]avsvmcloud[.]com Next, the domain name is resolved to an IP address, or to a list of IP addresses. For example, it may resolve to 20.140.0.1 . The resolved domain name will be returned into IPAddress structure that will contain an AddressFamily field – a special field that specifies the addressing scheme. If the host name returned in the IPAddress structure is different to the queried domain name, the returned host name will be used as a C2 host name for the backdoor. Otherwise, the malware will check if the resolved IP address matches one of the patterns below, in order to return an ‘address family’: IP Address Subnet Mask ‘Address Family’ 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Atm 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 Atm 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 Atm 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 Atm fc00:: fe00:: Atm fec0:: ffc0:: Atm ff00:: ff00:: Atm 41.84.159.0 255.255.255.0 Ipx 74.114.24.0 255.255.248.0 Ipx 154.118.140.0 255.255.255.0 Ipx 217.163.7.0 255.255.255.0 Ipx 20.140.0.0 255.254.0.0 ImpLink 96.31.172.0 255.255.255.0 ImpLink 131.228.12.0 255.255.252.0 ImpLink 144.86.226.0 255.255.255.0 ImpLink 8.18.144.0 255.255.254.0 NetBios 18.130.0.0 255.255.0.0 NetBios 71.152.53.0 255.255.255.0 NetBios 99.79.0.0 255.255.0.0 NetBios 87.238.80.0 255.255.248.0 NetBios 199.201.117.0 255.255.255.0 NetBios 184.72.0.0 255.254.0.0 NetBios For example, if the queried domain resolves to 20.140.0.1 , it will match the entry in the table 20.140.0.0 , for which the returned ‘address family’ will be ImpLink . The returned ‘address family’ invokes an additional logic in the malware. Disabling Security Tools and Antivirus Products If the returned ‘address family’ is ImpLink or Atm , the malware will enumerate all processes and for each process, it will check if its name matches one of the pre-defined hashes. Next, it repeats this processed for services and for the drivers installed in the system. If a process name or a full path of an installed driver matches one of the pre-defined hashes, the malware will disable it. For hashing, the malware relies on Fowler–Noll–Vo algorithm. For example, the core process of Windows Defender is MsMpEng.exe . The hash value of “ MsMpEng ” string is 5183687599225757871 . This value is specifically enlisted the malware’s source under a variable name timeStamps : timeStamps = new ulong[1] { 5183687599225757871uL } The service name of Windows Defender is windefend – the hash of this string ( 917638920165491138 ) is also present in the malware body. As a result, the malicioius DLL will attempt to stop the Windows Defender service. In order to disable various security tools and antivirus products, the malware first grants itself SeRestorePrivilege and SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege privileges, using the native AdjustTokenPrivileges() API. With these privileges enabled, the malware takes ownership of the service registry keys it intends to manipulate. The new owner of the keys is first attempted to be explicitly set to Administrator account. If such account is not present, the malware enumerates all user accounts, looking for a SID that represents the administrator account. The malware uses Windows Management Instrumentation query “ Select * From Win32_UserAccount ” to obtain the list of all users. For each enumerated user, it makes sure the account is local and then, when it obtains its SID, it makes sure the SID begins with S-1-5- and ends with -500 in order to locate the local administrator account. Once such account is found, it is used as a new owner for the registry keys, responsible for manipulation of the services of various security tools and antivirus products. With the new ownership set, the malware then disables these services by setting their Start value to 4 (Disabled): registryKey2.SetValue(“Start”), 4, RegistryValueKind.DWord); HTTP Backdoor If the returned ‘address family’ for the resolved domain name is NetBios , as specified in the lookup table above, the malware will initialise its HttpHelper class, which implements an HTTP backdoor. The backdoor commands are covered in the FireEye write-up, so let’s check only a couple of commands to see what output they produce. One of the backdoor commands is CollectSystemDescription . As its name suggests, it collects system information. By running the code reconstructed from the malware, here is an actual example of the data collected by the backdoor and delivered to the attacker’s C2 with a separate backdoor command UploadSystemDescription : 1. %DOMAIN_NAME% 2. S-1-5-21-298510922-2159258926-905146427 3. DESKTOP-VL39FPO 4. UserName 5. [E] Microsoft Windows NT 6.2.9200.0 6.2.9200.0 64 6. C:\WINDOWS\system32 7. 0 8. %PROXY_SERVER% Description: Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter #2 MACAddress: 9C:B6:D0:F6:FF:5D DHCPEnabled: True DHCPServer: 192.168.20.1 DNSHostName: DESKTOP-VL39FPO DNSDomainSuffixSearchOrder: Home DNSServerSearchOrder: 8.8.8.8, 192.168.20.1 IPAddress: 192.168.20.30, fe80::8412:d7a8:57b9:5886 IPSubnet: 255.255.255.0, 64 DefaultIPGateway: 192.168.20.1, fe80::1af1:45ff:feec:a8eb NOTE: Field #7 specifies the number of days (0) since the last system reboot. GetProcessByDescription command will build a list of processes running on a system. This command accepts an optional argument, which is one of the custom process properties enlisted here . If the optional argument is not specified, the backdoor builds a process list that looks like: [ 1720] svchost [ 8184] chrome [ 4732] svchost If the optional argument is specified, the backdoor builds a process list that includes the specified process property in addition to parent process ID, username and domain for the process owner. For example, if the optional argument is specified as “ ExecutablePath “, the GetProcessByDescription command may return a list similar to: [ 3656] sihost.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\sihost.exe 1720 DESKTOP-VL39FPO\UserName [ 3824] svchost.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\svchost.exe 992 DESKTOP-VL39FPO\UserName [ 9428] chrome.exe C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe 4600 DESKTOP-VL39FPO\UserName Other backdoor commands enable deployment of the 2nd stage malware. For example, the WriteFile command will save the file: using (FileStream fileStream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Append, FileAccess.Write)) { fileStream.Write(array, 0, array.Length); } The downloaded 2nd stage malware can then the executed with RunTask command: using (Process process = new Process()) { process.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(fileName, arguments) { CreateNoWindow = false, UseShellExecute = false }; if (process.Start()) … Alternatively, it can be configured to be executed with the system restart, using registry manipulation commands, such as SetRegistryValue . Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

Tsippi Dach, Director of Communications at AlgoSec, explores the relationship between NetOps and SecOps and explains why they are the... DevOps The importance of bridging NetOps and SecOps in network management Tsippi Dach 2 min read Tsippi Dach Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 4/16/21 Published Tsippi Dach, Director of Communications at AlgoSec, explores the relationship between NetOps and SecOps and explains why they are the perfect partnership The IT landscape has changed beyond recognition in the past decade or so. The vast majority of businesses now operate largely in the cloud, which has had a notable impact on their agility and productivity. A recent survey of 1,900 IT and security professionals found that 41 percent or organizations are running more of their workloads in public clouds compared to just one-quarter in 2019. Even businesses that were not digitally mature enough to take full advantage of the cloud will have dramatically altered their strategies in order to support remote working at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, with cloud innovation so high up the boardroom agenda, security is often left lagging behind, creating a vulnerability gap that businesses can little afford in the current heightened risk landscape. The same survey found the leading concern about cloud adoption was network security (58%). Managing organizations’ networks and their security should go hand-in-hand, but, as reflected in the survey, there’s no clear ownership of public cloud security. Responsibility is scattered across SecOps, NOCs and DevOps, and they don’t collaborate in a way that aligns with business interests. We know through experience that this siloed approach hurts security, so what should businesses do about it? How can they bridge the gap between NetOps and SecOps to keep their network assets secure and prevent missteps? Building a case for NetSecOps Today’s digital infrastructure demands the collaboration, perhaps even the convergence, of NetOps and SecOps in order to achieve maximum security and productivity. While the majority of businesses do have open communication channels between the two departments, there is still a large proportion of network and security teams working in isolation. This creates unnecessary friction, which can be problematic for service-based businesses that are trying to deliver the best possible end-user experience. The reality is that NetOps and SecOps share several commonalities. They are both responsible for critical aspects of a business and have to navigate constantly evolving environments, often under extremely restrictive conditions. Agility is particularly important for security teams in order for them to keep pace with emerging technologies, yet deployments are often stalled or abandoned at the implementation phase due to misconfigurations or poor execution. As enterprises continue to deploy software-defined networks and public cloud architecture, security has become even more important to the network team, which is why this convergence needs to happen sooner rather than later. We somehow need to insert the network security element into the NetOps pipeline and seamlessly make it just another step in the process. If we had a way to automatically check whether network connectivity is already enabled as part of the pre-delivery testing phase, that could, at least, save us the heartache of deploying something that will not work. Thankfully, there are tools available that can bring SecOps and NetOps closer together, such as Cisco ACI , Cisco Secure Workload and AlgoSec Security Management Solution . Cisco ACI, for instance, is a tightly coupled policy-driven solution that integrates software and hardware, allowing for greater application agility and data center automation. Cisco Secure Workload (previously known as Tetration), is a micro-segmentation and cloud workload protection platform that offers multi-cloud security based on a zero-trust model. When combined with AlgoSec, Cisco Secure Workload is able to map existing application connectivity and automatically generate and deploy security policies on different network security devices, such as ACI contract, firewalls, routers and cloud security groups. So, while Cisco Secure Workload takes care of enforcing security at each and every endpoint, AlgoSec handles network management. This is NetOps and SecOps convergence in action, allowing for 360-degree oversight of network and security controls for threat detection across entire hybrid and multi-vendor frameworks. While the utopian harmony of NetOps and SecOps may be some way off, using existing tools, processes and platforms to bridge the divide between the two departments can mitigate the ‘silo effect’ resulting in stronger, safer and more resilient operations. We recently hosted a webinar with Doug Hurd from Cisco and Henrik Skovfoged from Conscia discussing how you can bring NetOps and SecOps teams together with Cisco and AlgoSec. You can watch the recorded session here . Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

Survey finds that 58% of respondents are concerned about security in the cloud, while misconfigurations are one of the leading causes of breaches and outages as public cloud adoption doubles over past two years Cloud Security Alliance Releases Latest Survey Report on State of Cloud Security Concerns, Challenges, and Incidents Survey finds that 58% of respondents are concerned about security in the cloud, while misconfigurations are one of the leading causes of breaches and outages as public cloud adoption doubles over past two years March 30, 2021 Speak to one of our experts SEATTLE – March 30, 2021 – The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining and raising awareness of best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment, and AlgoSec , a leading provider of business-driven network and cloud security management solutions, today announced the results of a new study titled, “ State of Cloud Security Concerns, Challenges, and Incidents .” The survey, which queried nearly 1,900 IT and security professionals from a variety of organization sizes and locations, sought to gain deeper insight into the complex cloud environment that continues to emerge and that has only grown more complex since the onset of the pandemic. The survey found that over half of organizations are running 41 percent or more of their workloads in public clouds, compared to just one-quarter in 2019. In 2021, 63 percent of respondents expect to be running 41 percent or more of their workloads in public cloud, indicating that adoption of public cloud will only continue. Sixty-two percent of respondents use more than one cloud provider, and the diversity of production workloads (e.g. container platforms, virtual machines) is also expected to increase. Key findings include: Security tops concerns with cloud projects : Respondents’ leading concerns over cloud adoption were network security (58%), a lack of cloud expertise (47%), migrating workloads to the cloud (44%), and insufficient staff to manage cloud environments (32%). It’s notable that a total of 79 percent of respondents reported staff-related issues, highlighting that organizations are struggling with handling cloud deployments and a largely remote workforce. Cloud issues and misconfigurations are leading causes of breaches and outages : Eleven percent of respondents reported a cloud security incident in the past year with the three most common causes being cloud provider issues (26%), security misconfigurations (22%), and attacks such as denial of service exploits (20%). When asked about the impact of their most disruptive cloud outages, 24 percent said it took up to 3 hours to restore operations, and for 26 percent it took more than half a day. Nearly one-third still manage cloud security manually : Fifty-two percent of respondents stated they use cloud-native tools to manage security as part of their application orchestration process, and 50 percent reported using orchestration and configuration management tools such as Ansible, Chef and Puppet. Twenty-nine percent said they use manual processes to manage cloud security. Who controls cloud security is not clear-cut : Thirty-five percent of respondents said their security operations team managed cloud security, followed by the cloud team (18%), and IT operations (16%). Other teams such as network operations, DevOps and application owners all fell below 10 percent, showing confusion over exactly who owns public cloud security. “The use of cloud services has continued to increase over the past decade. Particularly now, in the wake of the COVID-19 public health crisis. With organizations struggling to address a largely remote workforce, many enterprises’ digital transformations have been accelerated to enable employees to work from home,” said Hillary Baron, lead author and research analyst, Cloud Security Alliance. “As an ever-more complex cloud environment continues to evolve, the need for supplementary security tools to improve public cloud security will, as well.” “In the face of complex environments, a dearth of security staff, and an overall lack of cloud knowledge, organizations are turning to security tools that can help supplement their workforce. Three of the top four benefits organizations look for in security management tools involve proactive detection of risks and automation. These types of tools can supplement the challenges many organizations are experiencing with lack of expertise (47%) and staff (32%), as well as improve visibility as they move toward an ever-changing cloud environment,” said Jade Kahn, AlgoSec Chief Marketing Officer.AlgoSec commissioned the survey to add to the industry’s knowledge about hybrid-cloud and multi-cloud security. Sponsors of CSA research are CSA Corporate Members, who support the findings of the research project but have no added influence on content development nor editing rights. The report and its findings are vendor-agnostic and allow for global participation. Download the free eBook now. About Cloud Security Alliance The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) is the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining and raising awareness of best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment. CSA harnesses the subject matter expertise of industry practitioners, associations, governments, and its corporate and individual members to offer cloud security-specific research, education, training, certification, events, and products. CSA’s activities, knowledge, and extensive network benefit the entire community impacted by cloud — from providers and customers to governments, entrepreneurs, and the assurance industry — and provide a forum through which different parties can work together to create and maintain a trusted cloud ecosystem. For further information, visit us at www.cloudsecurityalliance.org , and follow us on Twitter @cloudsa. About AlgoSec The leading provider of business-driven network security management solutions, AlgoSec helps the world’s largest organizations align security with their mission-critical business processes. With AlgoSec, users can discover, map and migrate business application connectivity, proactively analyze risk from the business perspective, tie cyber-attacks to business processes and intelligently automate network security changes with zero touch – across their cloud, SDN and on-premise networks. Over 1,800 enterprises, including 20 of the Fortune 50, have utilized AlgoSec’s solutions to make their organizations more agile, more secure and more compliant – all the time. Since 2005, AlgoSec has shown its commitment to customer satisfaction with the industry’s only money-back guarantee. www.algosec.com

Comprehensive training courses to help you become more efficient, and quickly understand all the features and customization options Training services and certification courses Training course methods We offer comprehensive training courses to help our customers and partners quickly understand all the features and customization options within the AlgoSec Security Management Solution.
Our courses are tailored for end users and/or administrators. 1 Users First level courses cover ASMS end to end basic functionality 2 Administrators Second level course cover ASMS deployment, maintenance and troubleshooting 3 Experts Third level courses cover Firewall Analyzer and FireFlow configuration 4 Masters Forth level course cover advanced FireFlow customization Certification Courses We offer comprehensive training courses to help our customers and partners quickly understand all the features and customization options within the AlgoSec Security Management Solution.
Our courses are tailored for end users and/or administrators. 1 Users AlgoSec Foundations AFA | AFF | Horizon AppViz | ACE 2 Administrators System Administrator 3 Experts AFA | AFF | Horizon AppViz Configuration 4 Masters AFA | AFF Master User AlgoSec Foundations - This course covers the basic end-to-end functionalities and operation of the AlgoSec Horizon Platform, including AlgoSec Horizon Security Analyzer (AFA), AlgoSec Horizon FireFlow (AFF), Horizon AppViz, and AlgoSec Cloud Enterprise (ACE). Administrator System Administrator - The AlgoSec platform requires ongoing administration, maintenance, and troubleshooting. This course focuses on deployment, system administration, maintenance, and troubleshooting at a customer level. Expert AFA Configuration - AlgoSec Horizon Security Analyzer can be configured for each customer’s needs and implemented in distributed deployments. This course focuses on Advanced Configuration and Integration for AFA. AFF Configuration - AlgoSec Horizon FireFlow can be configured for each customer’s needs and integrated with other systems. This course focuses on Advanced Configuration and Integration for AFF. Horizon AppViz Configuration - This course covers Horizon AppViz Configuration as part of an application-centric approach to Network Security Management. Master AFF Master - AlgoSec Horizon FireFlow can be customized for each customer’s needs and integrated with third-party systems. This advanced course focuses on Horizon FireFlow customization and integration and includes Perl programming usage. AFA Master - AlgoSec Horizon Security Analyzer Master course is an advanced, Master-level training designed for professionals who need to apply advanced map modeling techniques, troubleshooting complex network scenarios, and optimizing AFA network map. Training course methods We offer a variety of training course methods to fit your learning style, budget and schedule Free Online Self-Paced Modules Free short e-learning courses that allow you to study at your own time. Virtual Public Classes Live, instructor-led sessions with hands-on labs open to the public. You can view available dates on our training portal. Virtual Private Classes Live, instructor-led sessions with hands-on labs dedicated exclusively to your team. To schedule a private session, please contact Algosec Academy. Onsite Private Classes Instructor-led, in-person training with hands-on labs conducted at your location for your team only. Schedule time with one of our experts Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Efficiently improve network security and performance by cleaning up and optimizing your firewall rules Streamline operations and meet compliance requirements with ease Firewall rule cleanup & performance optimization tool Select a size Which network Can AlgoSec be used for continuous compliance monitoring? Yes, AlgoSec supports continuous compliance monitoring. As organizations adapt their security policies to meet emerging threats and address new vulnerabilities, they must constantly verify these changes against the compliance frameworks they subscribe to. AlgoSec can generate risk assessment reports and conduct internal audits on-demand, allowing compliance officers to monitor compliance performance in real-time. Security professionals can also use AlgoSec to preview and simulate proposed changes to the organization’s security policies. This gives compliance officers a valuable degree of lead-time before planned changes impact regulatory guidelines and allows for continuous real-time monitoring. Streamlining firewall policies: cleanup & optimization Dangers of outdated firewall rulesets How to audit your existing firewall policy How to properly perform a firewall cleanup Firewall optimization best practices Automate firewall configurations with AlgoSec Get the latest insights from the experts Use these six best practices to simplify compliance and risk mitigation with the AlgoSec Copy White paper Learn how AlgoSec can help you pass PCI-DSS Audits and ensure Copy Solution overview See how this customer improved compliance readiness and risk Copy Case study Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue