AlgoSec application discovery Enhance the discovery of your network applications Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

AlgoSec products are sold through our worldwide network of channel partners Request a quote, contact sales or locate a Partner How to buy Request a quote Contact Sales Locate a Partner AWS Marketplace Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Send us a note Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* Long answer Send message

Six levels of automation Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

In the fast-paced world of technology, where innovation drives success, organizations find themselves in a perpetual race to enhance their applications, captivate customers, and stay ahead of the competition. But as your organization launches its latest flagship CRM solution after months of meticulous planning, have you considered what happens beyond Day 0 or Day 1 of the rollout? Picture this: your meticulously diagrammed application architecture is in place, firewalls are fortified, and... Application Connectivity Management Navigating the complex landscape of dynamic app security with AlgoSec Horizon AppViz Malcom Sargla 2 min read Malcom Sargla Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 8/10/23 Published In the fast-paced world of technology, where innovation drives success, organizations find themselves in a perpetual race to enhance their applications, captivate customers, and stay ahead of the competition. But as your organization launches its latest flagship CRM solution after months of meticulous planning, have you considered what happens beyond Day 0 or Day 1 of the rollout? Picture this: your meticulously diagrammed application architecture is in place, firewalls are fortified, and cloud policies are strategically aligned. The application tiers are defined, the flows are crystal clear, and security guardrails are firmly established to safeguard your prized asset. The stage is set for success – until the application inevitably evolves, communicates, and grows. This dynamic nature of applications presents a new challenge: ensuring their security, compliance, and optimal performance while navigating a complex web of relationships. Do you know who your Apps are hanging out with? Enter AlgoSec Horizon AppViz – the game-changing solution that unveil the hidden intricacies of your application ecosystem, ensuring a secure and accelerated application delivery process. In a world where agility, insights, and outcomes reign supreme, Horizon AppViz offers a revolutionary approach to handling application security. The urgent need for application agility In a landscape driven by customer demands, competitive advantages, and revenue growth, organizations can’t afford to rest on their laurels. However, as applications become increasingly complex, managing them becomes a monumental task: – Infrastructure Complexity: Juggling on-premises, cloud, and multi-vendor solutions is a daunting endeavor. – Conflicting Demands: Balancing the needs of development, operations, and management often leads to a tug-of-war. – Rising Customer Expectations: Meeting stringent time-to-market and feature release demands becomes a challenge. – Resource Constraints : A scarcity of application, networking, and security resources hampers progress. – Instant Global Impact: A single misstep in application delivery or performance can be broadcasted worldwide in seconds. – Unseen Threats: Zero-day vulnerabilities and ever-evolving threat landscapes keep organizations on edge. The high stakes of ignoring dynamic application management Failure to adopt a holistic and dynamic approach to application delivery and security management can result in dire consequences for your business: – Delayed Time-to-Market: Lags in application deployment can translate to missed opportunities and revenue loss. – Revenue Erosion: Unsatisfied customers and delayed releases can dent your bottom line. – Operational Inefficiencies: Productivity takes a hit as resources are wasted on inefficient processes. – Wasted Investments: Ill-informed decisions lead to unnecessary spending. – Customer Dissatisfaction: Poor application experiences erode customer trust and loyalty. – Brand Erosion: Negative publicity from application failures tarnishes your brand image. – Regulatory Woes: Non-compliance and governance violations invite legal repercussions. The AlgoSec Horizon AppViz advantage So, how does Horizon AppViz address these challenges and fortify your application ecosystem? Let’s take a closer look at its groundbreaking features: – Dynamic Application Learning: Seamlessly integrates with leading security solutions to provide real-time insights into application paths and relationships. – Real-time Health Monitoring: Instantly detects and alerts you to unhealthy application relationships. – Intelligent Policy Management: Streamlines security policy control, ensuring compliance and minimizing risk. – Automated Provisioning: Safely provisions applications with verified business requirements, eliminating uncertainty. – Micro-Segmentation Mastery: Enables precise micro-segmentation, enhancing security without disrupting functionality. – Vulnerability Visibility: Identifies and helps remediate vulnerabilities within your business-critical applications. In a world where application agility is paramount, AlgoSec Horizon AppViz emerges as the bridge between innovation and security. With its robust features and intelligent insights, Horizon AppViz empowers organizations to confidently navigate the dynamic landscape of application security, achieving business outcomes that set them apart in a fiercely competitive environment. Request a demo and embrace the future of application agility – embrace AlgoSec Horizon AppViz. Secure, accelerate, and elevate your application delivery today. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

As you may have heard already, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released a joint... Cloud Security Drovorub’s Ability to Conceal C2 Traffic And Its Implications For Docker Containers Rony Moshkovich 2 min read Rony Moshkovich Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 8/15/20 Published As you may have heard already, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released a joint Cybersecurity Advisory about previously undisclosed Russian malware called Drovorub. According to the report, the malware is designed for Linux systems as part of its cyber espionage operations. Drovorub is a Linux malware toolset that consists of an implant coupled with a kernel module rootkit, a file transfer and port forwarding tool, and a Command and Control (C2) server. The name Drovorub originates from the Russian language. It is a complex word that consists of 2 roots (not the full words): “drov” and “rub” . The “o” in between is used to join both roots together. The root “drov” forms a noun “drova” , which translates to “firewood” , or “wood” . The root “rub” /ˈruːb/ forms a verb “rubit” , which translates to “to fell” , or “to chop” . Hence, the original meaning of this word is indeed a “woodcutter” . What the report omits, however, is that apart from the classic interpretation, there is also slang. In the Russian computer slang, the word “drova” is widely used to denote “drivers” . The word “rubit” also has other meanings in Russian. It may mean to kill, to disable, to switch off. In the Russian slang, “rubit” also means to understand something very well, to be professional in a specific field. It resonates with the English word “sharp” – to be able to cut through the problem. Hence, we have 3 possible interpretations of ‘ Drovorub ‘: someone who chops wood – “дроворуб” someone who disables other kernel-mode drivers – “тот, кто отрубает / рубит драйвера” someone who understands kernel-mode drivers very well – “тот, кто (хорошо) рубит в драйверах” Given that Drovorub does not disable other drivers, the last interpretation could be the intended one. In that case, “Drovorub” could be a code name of the project or even someone’s nickname. Let’s put aside the intricacies of the Russian translations and get a closer look into the report. DISCLAIMER Before we dive into some of the Drovorub analysis aspects, we need to make clear that neither FBI nor NSA has shared any hashes or any samples of Drovorub. Without the samples, it’s impossible to conduct a full reverse engineering analysis of the malware. Netfilter Hiding According to the report, the Drovorub-kernel module registers a Netfilter hook. A network packet filter with a Netfilter hook ( NF_INET_LOCAL_IN and NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT ) is a common malware technique. It allows a backdoor to watch passively for certain magic packets or series of packets, to extract C2 traffic. What is interesting though, is that the driver also hooks the kernel’s nf_register_hook() function. The hook handler will register the original Netfilter hook, then un-register it, then re-register the kernel’s own Netfilter hook. According to the nf_register_hook() function in the Netfilter’s source , if two hooks have the same protocol family (e.g., PF_INET ), and the same hook identifier (e.g., NF_IP_INPUT ), the hook execution sequence is determined by priority. The hook list enumerator breaks at the position of an existing hook with a priority number elem->priority higher than the new hook’s priority number reg->priority : int nf_register_hook ( struct nf_hook_ops * reg) { struct nf_hook_ops * elem; int err; err = mutex_lock_interruptible( & nf_hook_mutex); if (err < 0 ) return err; list_for_each_entry(elem, & nf_hooks[reg -> pf][reg -> hooknum], list) { if (reg -> priority < elem -> priority) break ; } list_add_rcu( & reg -> list, elem -> list.prev); mutex_unlock( & nf_hook_mutex); ... return 0 ; } In that case, the new hook is inserted into the list, so that the higher-priority hook’s PREVIOUS link would point into the newly inserted hook. What happens if the new hook’s priority is also the same, such as NF_IP_PRI_FIRST – the maximum hook priority? In that case, the break condition will not be met, the list iterator list_for_each_entry will slide past the existing hook, and the new hook will be inserted after it as if the new hook’s priority was higher. By re-inserting its Netfilter hook in the hook handler of the nf_register_hook() function, the driver makes sure the Drovorub’s Netfilter hook will beat any other registered hook at the same hook number and with the same (maximum) priority. If the intercepted TCP packet does not belong to the hidden TCP connection, or if it’s destined to or originates from another process, hidden by Drovorub’s kernel-mode driver, the hook will return 5 ( NF_STOP ). Doing so will prevent other hooks from being called to process the same packet. Security Implications For Docker Containers Given that Drovorub toolset targets Linux and contains a port forwarding tool to route network traffic to other hosts on the compromised network, it would not be entirely unreasonable to assume that this toolset was detected in a client’s cloud infrastructure. According to Gartner’s prediction , in just two years, more than 75% of global organizations will be running cloud-native containerized applications in production, up from less than 30% today. Would the Drovorub toolset survive, if the client’s cloud infrastructure was running containerized applications? Would that facilitate the attack or would it disrupt it? Would it make the breach stealthier? To answer these questions, we have tested a different malicious toolset, CloudSnooper, reported earlier this year by Sophos. Just like Drovorub, CloudSnooper’s kernel-mode driver also relies on a Netfilter hook ( NF_INET_LOCAL_IN and NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT ) to extract C2 traffic from the intercepted TCP packets. As seen in the FBI/NSA report, the Volatility framework was used to carve the Drovorub kernel module out of the host, running CentOS. In our little lab experiment, let’s also use CentOS host. To build a new Docker container image, let’s construct the following Dockerfile: FROM scratch ADD centos-7.4.1708-docker.tar.xz / ADD rootkit.ko / CMD [“/bin/bash”] The new image, built from scratch, will have the CentOS 7.4 installed. The kernel-mode rootkit will be added to its root directory. Let’s build an image from our Dockerfile, and call it ‘test’: [root@localhost 1]# docker build . -t test Sending build context to Docker daemon 43.6MB Step 1/4 : FROM scratch —> Step 2/4 : ADD centos-7.4.1708-docker.tar.xz / —> 0c3c322f2e28 Step 3/4 : ADD rootkit.ko / —> 5aaa26212769 Step 4/4 : CMD [“/bin/bash”] —> Running in 8e34940342a2 Removing intermediate container 8e34940342a2 —> 575e3875cdab Successfully built 575e3875cdab Successfully tagged test:latest Next, let’s execute our image interactively (with pseudo-TTY and STDIN ): docker run -it test The executed image will be waiting for our commands: [root@8921e4c7d45e /]# Next, let’s try to load the malicious kernel module: [root@8921e4c7d45e /]# insmod rootkit.ko The output of this command is: insmod: ERROR: could not insert module rootkit.ko: Operation not permitted The reason why it failed is that by default, Docker containers are ‘unprivileged’. Loading a kernel module from a docker container requires a special privilege that allows it doing so. Let’s repeat our experiment. This time, let’s execute our image either in a fully privileged mode or by enabling only one capability – a capability to load and unload kernel modules ( SYS_MODULE ). docker run -it –privileged test or docker run -it –cap-add SYS_MODULE test Let’s load our driver again: [root@547451b8bf87 /]# insmod rootkit.ko This time, the command is executed silently. Running lsmod command allows us to enlist the driver and to prove it was loaded just fine. A little magic here is to quit the docker container and then delete its image: docker rmi -f test Next, let’s execute lsmod again, only this time on the host. The output produced by lsmod will confirm the rootkit module is loaded on the host even after the container image is fully unloaded from memory and deleted! Let’s see what ports are open on the host: [root@localhost 1]# netstat -tulpn Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1044/sshd With the SSH server running on port 22 , let’s send a C2 ‘ping’ command to the rootkit over port 22 : [root@localhost 1]# python client.py 127.0.0.1 22 8080 rrootkit-negotiation: hello The ‘hello’ response from the rootkit proves it’s fully operational. The Netfilter hook detects a command concealed in a TCP packet transferred over port 22 , even though the host runs SSH server on port 22 . How was it possible that a rootkit loaded from a docker container ended up loaded on the host? The answer is simple: a docker container is not a virtual machine. Despite the namespace and ‘control groups’ isolation, it still relies on the same kernel as the host. Therefore, a kernel-mode rootkit loaded from inside a Docker container instantly compromises the host, thus allowing the attackers to compromise other containers that reside on the same host. It is true that by default, a Docker container is ‘unprivileged’ and hence, may not load kernel-mode drivers. However, if a host is compromised, or if a trojanized container image detects the presence of the SYS_MODULE capability (as required by many legitimate Docker containers), loading a kernel-mode rootkit on a host from inside a container becomes a trivial task. Detecting the SYS_MODULE capability ( cap_sys_module ) from inside the container: [root@80402f9c2e4c /]# capsh –print Current: = cap_chown, … cap_sys_module, … Conclusion This post is drawing a parallel between the recently reported Drovorub rootkit and CloudSnooper, a rootkit reported earlier this year. Allegedly built by different teams, both of these Linux rootkits have one mechanism in common: a Netfilter hook ( NF_INET_LOCAL_IN and NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT ) and a toolset that enables tunneling of the traffic to other hosts within the same compromised cloud infrastructure. We are still hunting for the hashes and samples of Drovorub. Unfortunately, the YARA rules published by FBI/NSA cause False Positives. For example, the “Rule to detect Drovorub-server, Drovorub-agent, and Drovorub-client binaries based on unique strings and strings indicating statically linked libraries” enlists the following strings: “Poco” “Json” “OpenSSL” “clientid” “—–BEGIN” “—–END” “tunnel” The string “Poco” comes from the POCO C++ Libraries that are used for over 15 years. It is w-a-a-a-a-y too generic, even in combination with other generic strings. As a result, all these strings, along with the ELF header and a file size between 1MB and 10MB, produce a false hit on legitimate ARM libraries, such as a library used for GPS navigation on Android devices: f058ebb581f22882290b27725df94bb302b89504 56c36bfd4bbb1e3084e8e87657f02dbc4ba87755 Nevertheless, based on the information available today, our interest is naturally drawn to the security implications of these Linux rootkits for the Docker containers. Regardless of what security mechanisms may have been compromised, Docker containers contribute an additional attack surface, another opportunity for the attackers to compromise the hosts and other containers within the same organization. The scenario outlined in this post is purely hypothetical. There is no evidence that supports that Drovorub may have affected any containers. However, an increase in volume and sophistication of attacks against Linux-based cloud-native production environments, coupled with the increased proliferation of containers, suggests that such a scenario may, in fact, be plausible. Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

Prof. Avishai Wool discusses the complexities of mergers and acquisitions for application management and how organizations can securely... Security Policy Management Managing network connectivity during mergers and acquisitions Prof. Avishai Wool 2 min read Prof. Avishai Wool Short bio about author here Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Vitae donec tincidunt elementum quam laoreet duis sit enim. Duis mattis velit sit leo diam. Tags Share this article 7/22/21 Published Prof. Avishai Wool discusses the complexities of mergers and acquisitions for application management and how organizations can securely navigate the transition It comes as no surprise that the number of completed Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As) dropped significantly during the early stages of the pandemic as businesses closed ranks and focused on surviving rather than thriving. However, as we start to find some reprieve, many experts forecast that we’ll see an upturn in activity. In fact, by the end of 2020, M&A experienced a sudden surge and finished the year with only a 3% decline on 2019 levels. Acquiring companies is more than just writing a cheque. There are hundreds of things to consider both big and small, from infrastructure to staffing, which can make or break a merger. With that in mind, what do businesses need to do in order to ensure a secure and successful transition? When two worlds collide For many businesses, a merger or acquisition is highly charged. There’s often excitement about new beginnings mixed with trepidation about major business changes, not least when it comes to IT security. Mergers and acquisitions are like two planets colliding, each with their own intricate ecosystem. You have two enterprises running complex IT infrastructures with hundreds if not thousands of applications that don’t just simply integrate together. More often than not they perform replicated functions, which implies that some need to be used in parallel, while others need to be decommissioned and removed. This means amending, altering, and updating thousands of policies to accommodate new connections, applications, servers, and firewalls without creating IT security risks or outages. In essence, from an IT security perspective, a merger or acquisition is a highly complicated project that, if not planned and implemented properly, can have a long-term impact on business operations. Migrating and merging infrastructures One thing a business will need before it can even start the M&A process is an exhaustive inventory of all business applications spanning both businesses. An auto-discovery tool can assist here, collecting data from any application that is active on the network and adding it to a list. This should allow the main business to create a map of network connectivity flows which will form the cornerstone of the migration from an application perspective. Next comes security. A vulnerability assessment should be carried across both enterprise networks to identify any business-critical applications that may be put at risk. This assessment will give the main business the ability to effectively ‘rank’ applications and devices in terms of risk and necessity, allowing for priority lists to be created. This will help SecOps focus their efforts on crucial areas of the business that contain sensitive customer data, for instance. By following these steps you’ll get a clear organizational view of the entire enterprise environment and be able to identify and map all the critical business applications, linking vulnerabilities and cyber risks to specific applications and prioritize remediation actions based on business-driven needs. The power of automation While the steps outlined above will give you with an accurate picture of your IT topology and its business risk, this is only the first half of the story. Now you need to update security policies to support changes to business applications. Automation is critical when it comes to maintaining security during a merger or acquisition. An alarming number of data breaches are due to firewall misconfigurations, often resulting from attempts to change policies manually in a complex network environment. This danger increases with M&A, because the two merging enterprises likely have different firewall setups in place, often mixing traditional with next-generation firewalls or firewalls that come from different vendors. Automation is therefore essential to ensure the firewall change management process is handled effectively and securely with minimal risk of misconfigurations. Achieving true Zero-Touch automation in the network security domain is not an easy task but over time, you can let your automation solution run handsfree as you conduct more changes and gain trust through increasing automation levels step by step. Our Security Management Solution enables IT and security teams to manage and control all their security devices – from cloud controls in public clouds, SDNs, and on-premise firewalls from one single console. With AlgoSec you can automate time-consuming security policy changes and proactively assess risk to ensure continuous compliance. It is our business-driven approach to security policy management that enables organizations to reduce business risk, ensure security and continuous compliance, and drive business agility. Maintaining security throughout the transition A merger or acquisition presents a range of IT challenges but ensuring business applications can continue to run securely throughout the transition is critical. If you take an application centric approach and utilize automation, you will be in the best position for the merger/migration and will ultimately drive long term success. To learn more or speak to one of our security experts, schedule your personal demo . Schedule a demo Related Articles Q1 at AlgoSec: What innovations and milestones defined our start to 2026? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read 2025 in review: What innovations and milestones defined AlgoSec’s transformative year in 2025? AlgoSec Reviews Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Navigating Compliance in the Cloud AlgoSec Cloud Mar 19, 2023 · 2 min read Speak to one of our experts Speak to one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Schedule a call

PCI DSS 4: Automating Audits and Ensuring Continuous Compliance with AlgoSec Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Best practices for network security governance in AWS and hybrid network environments Webinars Achieving Visibility and Security in AWS and across the Hybrid Network | AWS & AlgoSec Joint Webinar As enterprises rapidly migrate data and applications to public clouds such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), they achieve many benefits, including advanced security capabilities, but also face new security challenges. AWS lets organizations operate applications in a hybrid deployment mode by providing multiple networking capabilities. To maintain an effective security posture while deploying applications across complex hybrid network environments, security professionals need a holistic view and control from a single source. Yet, security isn’t just the responsibility of the cloud providers alone. Organizations need to understand the shared responsibility model and their role in maintaining a secure deployment. While AWS’s cloud framework is secured by AWS, the challenge of using the cloud securely is the responsibility of your organization’s IT and CISOs. As multiple DevOps and IT personnel make frequent configuration changes, the shared responsibility model helps achieve visibility and maintain cloud security. In this webinar, Yonatan Klein, AlgoSec’s Director of Product, and Ram Dileepan, Amazon Web Service’s Partner Solutions Architect, will share best practices for network security governance in AWS and hybrid network environments. January 22, 2020 Yonatan Klein irector of Product Management Relevant resources Migrating Business Applications to AWS? Tips on Where to Start Keep Reading Extending Network Security Visibility and Control into AWS Keep Reading Combining Security Groups and Network ACLs to Bypass AWS Capacity Limitations Watch Video Change Management, Auditing and Compliance in an AWS Hybrid Environment Watch Video Advanced Security, Visibility & Management For Aws Clouds Read Document AWS Security Fundamentals: Dos and Don’ts Keep Reading Choose a better way to manage your network Choose a better way to manage your network Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Compare firewall compliance automation tools by fit, including NSPM platforms, native firewall managers, cloud controls, and audit tools Best firewall compliance automation tools for enterprise security teams What are the best firewall compliance automation tools for hybrid networks? The tool search often starts after a familiar audit request: show who approved a rule, why the access exists, whether traffic still uses it, and what evidence proves the review happened. In a hybrid network, that question may cross data center firewalls, cloud security groups, network security groups, change tickets, exception records, and application owners. Firewall compliance automation tools help enterprise teams review policies, validate access against internal or regulatory requirements, manage recertification, document approvals, and preserve audit-ready evidence. The right fit depends on the environment. Multi-vendor enterprises usually need a network security policy management platform. Single-vendor teams may use native firewall managers. Cloud teams may use provider-native controls, while audit teams may also need configuration assessment tools. Schedule a Demo Why firewall compliance automation is hard in enterprise networks Firewall compliance work is rarely just reporting. Teams have to connect network security management with change control, access review, and evidence collection. A rule can look idle in a short traffic sample and still support a disaster recovery test. A temporary cloud security group exception can also become part of production when no owner closes the loop. The harder question is usually not whether a rule exists. It is whether the organization can explain why it exists, who owns it, what application depends on it, what risk it introduces, and whether it still supports a valid business need. Without that context, compliance work becomes a scramble through tickets, spreadsheets, screenshots, and old approval emails. Automation can reduce that manual investigation. However, no tool should be treated as a compliance guarantee. Good automation gives teams a clearer, faster way to review access and preserve evidence, while people still own the judgment, approval, and remediation decisions. Schedule a Demo Firewall compliance automation tools at a glance The strongest short list starts with tool category, not with a universal ranking. In practice, a hybrid enterprise, a Palo Alto Networks-heavy environment, and an AWS-first cloud team may need different controls and evidence paths. This is not a performance ranking. It is a practical evaluation map. Before procurement, verify current product capabilities, licensing, deployment scope, and source-backed vendor claims. Tool category Examples to evaluate Best fit What to verify NSPM platforms AlgoSec Horizon, Tufin, FireMon Hybrid and multi-vendor networks where compliance evidence depends on policy, risk, application, change, and audit context Application context Firewall and cloud coverage, rule recertification, change audit trail Vendor-native firewall managers Palo Alto Networks Strata Cloud Manager, Cisco Security Cloud Control, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, Fortinet FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer, Check Point Security Compliance Teams standardized on one firewall vendor and managing policy inside that ecosystem Scope across third-party devices, cloud controls, reporting, and workflow integrations Cloud-native policy managers AWS Firewall Manager, Azure Firewall Manager, Google Cloud Firewall Insights Cloud teams managing provider-native firewall policies, security groups, NSGs, or VPC firewall rules Account, subscription, project, and region scope; evidence handoff to central security teams Audit and configuration assessment tools Titania Nipper InfraSight Audit or assessor teams that need point-in-time configuration evidence for firewalls, routers, and switches Whether the tool supports ongoing policy governance or primarily provides assessment evidence Schedule a Demo Introduction A useful compliance report should do more than show that a rule exists. During firewall auditing and compliance , teams need to preserve the story behind access: rule purpose, owner, business justification, application dependency, traffic history, risk assessment, change request, approval, exception, recertification result, and remediation record. That evidence matters for compliance and cost control. When reviewers can see the owner, usage, and business reason in one review path, they spend less time rebuilding context. It also supports better risk decisions because stale rules, shadow access, broad objects, and policy drift can be reviewed with the business impact in view. Application context is especially important for recertification. A technical rule review asks whether the rule exists or shows recent traffic. Application-centric recertification asks which application or connectivity flow depends on the access, who owns it, and whether the flow should be approved, changed, or removed. That difference can prevent a cleanup task from becoming an outage ticket. Schedule a Demo How to compare firewall compliance automation tools Start with environment coverage. A tool that works well for one firewall vendor may still leave gaps when the same control spans data center firewalls, cloud firewalls, security groups, NSGs, and VPC firewall rules. For a hybrid enterprise, the key question is whether reviewers can follow access across the path, not just inside one console. Next, look at review and cleanup depth. The tool should help identify stale rules, unused access, overly permissive objects, shadowed rules, and policy drift. For teams with large cleanup backlogs, firewall policy cleanup should be tied to ownership, traffic history, application dependency, and change impact instead of becoming a spreadsheet exercise. Change governance is just as important. If a request is approved in one system and implemented in another, the audit story can split apart. A strong process connects requests, risk review, approvals, implementation, exceptions, and evidence through security policy change management so the team can show what changed and why. Finally, test how the tool handles applications. A firewall rule may protect a payment system, a batch job, or a seasonal reporting flow. Teams need application connectivity management context before they narrow or remove access, especially when application owners must validate whether the flow still supports the business. Schedule a Demo Where native managers and audit tools fit Native firewall and cloud managers can be the right fit when the environment is standardized. A Palo Alto Networks team may value Strata Cloud Manager. A Cisco team may stay close to Security Cloud Control or Secure Firewall Management Center. Fortinet and Check Point environments may use their native management and compliance capabilities, while AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud teams may rely on provider-native policy tools for cloud-specific governance. The tradeoff is scope. Native tools are often strongest inside their ecosystem. They may not replace a platform view when the audit question crosses several vendors, multiple clouds, legacy rules, change tickets, and application ownership records. Audit-focused tools solve another part of the problem. Configuration assessment tools can help produce point-in-time evidence for device hardening, baseline checks, and remediation planning. They are useful for audits, but security teams should confirm whether they also support ongoing policy change governance, recertification routing, and operational handoff. Schedule a Demo How AlgoSec Horizon fits into firewall compliance automation This is where a platform view matters. AlgoSec Horizon helps enterprise teams connect application context, security policy visibility, risk analysis, governed change processes, and compliance-ready evidence across hybrid networks. The goal is not blind automation. It is better evidence for decisions that still need owners, approvals, and review. AlgoSec Horizon also supports application-centric rule recertification. Instead of reviewing firewall rules only as technical objects, teams can review the applications and connectivity flows those rules support. Application owners can help confirm whether an application still exists, whether access is still required, and whether specific flows should be approved, changed, or removed. That context supports the value pillars that matter in compliance automation: reduced manual investigation, stronger audit readiness, governed automation, and clearer risk decisions. Security, network, cloud, compliance, and application teams get a shared way to review access without treating compliance as a last-minute reporting task. Schedule a Demo Frequently asked questions What is a firewall compliance automation tool? A firewall compliance automation tool helps teams review firewall and cloud access policies, manage rule recertification, validate access against standards or internal controls, route approvals, and preserve audit-ready evidence. It should make audit preparation less dependent on spreadsheets, screenshots, and one-off ticket searches. What is the best firewall compliance automation tool for enterprises? There is no universal best tool. Hybrid and multi-vendor enterprises usually need an NSPM or application-centric policy management platform. Single-vendor teams may use native firewall managers, cloud-first teams may use provider-native tools, and audit teams may add configuration assessment tools. Can firewall compliance automation tools guarantee PCI DSS or ISO 27001 compliance? No. These tools can support audit readiness, evidence collection, rule review, and recertification, but compliance obligations depend on the organization, environment, assessor, scope, and framework. Software should support the process, not replace qualified compliance review. How are NSPM tools different from native firewall managers? NSPM tools are built to help manage policy, risk, change, and evidence across mixed environments. Native firewall managers are often strongest inside one vendor or cloud ecosystem. The right choice depends on how far the audit trail has to travel across vendors, clouds, applications, and change systems. What evidence should security teams preserve for firewall audits? Preserve the rule purpose, owner, business justification, application dependency, traffic history, risk assessment, change request, approval, exception, recertification result, and remediation record. In practice, the evidence is most useful when it links technical access to ownership and business need. Schedule a Demo See how AlgoSec Horizon can help If your team is preparing for firewall audits, rule recertification, or hybrid policy cleanup, AlgoSec Horizon can help connect application-centric visibility, risk analysis, controlled change processes, and audit-ready evidence across hybrid networks. Schedule a Demo Select a size What are the best firewall compliance automation tools for hybrid networks? Why firewall compliance automation is hard in enterprise networks Firewall compliance automation tools at a glance Introduction How to compare firewall compliance automation tools Where native managers and audit tools fit How AlgoSec Horizon fits into firewall compliance automation Frequently asked questions See how AlgoSec Horizon can help Get the latest insights from the experts Choose a better way to manage your network

AlgoSec Horizon FireFlow Automate and secure policy changes Download PDF Download PDF Add a Title Add a Title Add a Title Schedule time with one of our experts Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Learn best practices to secure your cloud environment and deliver applications securely Webinars 5 Tips for Securing your Multi-Cloud Environment As more organizations embrace hybrid workplaces, multi-cloud environments have become a popular way to deliver resource availability. Still, this development has not been without security concerns. As most breaches are the fault of human error, the most effective way to protect your multi-cloud environment is by training your team to implement best practices designed to minimize risk and deliver applications securely. In this webinar, we’ll cover 5 easy tips that will help you secure your multi-cloud environment. October 12, 2022 Ava Chawla Global Head of Cloud Security Jacqueline Basil Product Marketing Manager Relevant resources 6 must-dos to secure the hybrid cloud Read Document 5 things you didn’t know you could do with a security policy management solution Keep Reading A Pragmatic Approach to Network Security Across Your Hybrid Cloud Environment Keep Reading Choose a better way to manage your network Choose a better way to manage your network Work email* First name* Last name* Company* country* Select country... Short answer* By submitting this form, I accept AlgoSec's privacy policy Continue

Explore Algosec's customer success stories to see how organizations worldwide improve security, compliance, and efficiency with our solutions. Dimension Data Enhances Delivery Of Managed Security Services With AlgoSec Organization DIMENSION DATA Industry Technology Headquarters Australia Download case study Share Customer
success stories "We were fortunate enough to get a double benefit from using AlgoSec in our environment — reducing costs to serve our clients, and expanding our service offerings" IT Solution Provider Streamlines and Automates Security Operations for Clients AlgoSec Business Impact Generate incremental revenue from new policy compliance management services Reduce cost of service for Managed Security Service offering Improve quality of service, assuring a direct and timely response to security issues Background Dimension Data, founded in 1983 and headquartered in Africa, provides global specialized IT services and solutions to help their clients plan, build, support and manage their IT infrastructures. The company serves over 6,000 clients in 58 countries and in all major industry verticals. Dimension Data serves 79% of the Global Fortune Top 100 and 63% of the Global Fortune 500. Challenge In an effort to bring greater efficiency and flexibility, Dimension Data Australia sought to apply security industry best practices and streamlined processes to its delivery methodology. Automation was identified as a key capability that would enable them to reduce service costs and increase quality of service. “The operational management of security infrastructure is quite labor intensive,” remarks Martin Schlatter, Security Services Product Manager at Dimension Data. “The principle reasons for automating managed services are reducing work time, freeing up people for other tasks, and leveraging expertise that is ‘built in’ the automated tool.” By doing this Dimension Data could offer better service to existing clients while expanding their client base. “Additionally, the increased appetite for the Managed Security Services offering has been fueled by an increasing focus on governance, risk management and compliance, and we are expected to deliver faster and more accurate visibility of the security and compliance posture of the network,” explains Schlatter. Solution Dimension Data selected the AlgoSec Security Management Solution as a part of their toolset to deliver their Managed Security Services, which include automated and fully integrated operational management of client security infrastructures. The intelligent automation at the heart of AlgoSec will enable Dimension Data’s team to easily and effectively perform change monitoring, risk assessment, compliance verification and policy optimization for their clients, and act upon the findings quickly. This includes getting rid of unused or obsolete rules in the policy, reordering rules to increase performance and identifying risky rules. Another key factor in the decision making process was the relationship between Dimension Data and AlgoSec. “AlgoSec was deemed most suitable to meet our delivery needs for Managed Services. We selected them for their specific technology fit, and flexibility to assist in growing our managed service business. The partnership element was eventually the overriding factor,” says Schlatter. Results With AlgoSec, Dimension Data is now able to deliver their clients a comprehensive view of the security posture of their network security devices. This is crucial to establishing a baseline understanding of a security network, which makes it possible to truly assess and remediate risks, errors and inefficiencies. The ability to automatically provide this type of information at the most accurate level provides a key competitive differentiator for the company and a large benefit for its clients. “The value-added contribution is saving time, in terms of automation,” remarked Schlatter. “We found a way to reduce costs by automating manual operational tasks. At the same time, we were fortunate enough to leverage AlgoSec to expand our service offerings, so we got a double benefit from using AlgoSec in our environment.” One of the major features of integrating AlgoSec into the Dimension Data solution is the ability to support multiple client domains from a single AlgoSec management console. “This scalable configuration has proven to be invaluable when managing multiple clients with complex multi-vendor, multi-device security environments,” says Schlatter. “It consolidates administrative tasks, cuts time and costs, and ensures proper administration and segregation of duties from our end.” AlgoSec enhances the Managed Security Services offerings by delivering comprehensive risk and compliance management. Dimension Data professionals can generate risk and audit-ready compliance reports in a fraction of the time and with much greater accuracy compared to traditional manual analysis. “Our clients who require ISO 27001 and PCI DSS accreditation have greatly benefitted from this,” said Schlatter. Schedule time with one of our experts